Talk:Electric Daisy Carnival (album)

Cover Image

The warnings kept scaring me away from uploading the cover.Kristinwt (talk) 06:49, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just tried to add the history. And when I did, it hid the References and External References and I don't know how to get them to show up. (sigh).Kristinwt (talk) 06:58, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed... E_dog95'^{Hi '} 14:18, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Primary Sourcing

I don't feel bad about using the web site of a promoter even though it can sound like advertising. Wikipedia is foremost an encyclopedia and as such is one to rely on proof and verification. I feel it is important to provide original or Primary sources for justification behind articles. I know it's a challenge between sounding like a plug for a company versus quoting original sources. But, how I see it is, since WP is about going to the Source, what better place for pointing people than to the ones who ran the concert and produced the CD. I think it is of the highest good to refer readers to the originators, the ones who would know best. Sure, they may have one take on it. But, I think it's courtesy to allow them to speak about themselves, at least. It is also permissible to have outsiders report on what they see. When you're writing a report in school the teacher always says to go with primary sources, the ones who were there, the ones who were eye witnesses, not just hearsay or opinion or someone who SPOKE with someone who was there. Let's hear it for Primary Sources. Kristinwt (talk) 07:09, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stubbiness

I think this article is long enough to not have to be called a Stub any more. Is there a minimum before it can be all grown up and ready to fly? I think there is lots of info here that someone unfamiliar would be able to go away with a concept of what it is about. I don't know how much more can be added. A review of the music by a critic? Some discussion on the concert series (which might be out of scope).Kristinwt (talk) 07:14, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Festival & CD Article Seperation

I believe that the CD article should be seperated from the festival article, and that the festival article should have prominence over the EDC Compilation by Doran. Anyone Agree? --70.170.24.76 (talk) 19:09, 2 May 2008 (UTC) E_dog95'^{Hi '} 21:59, 2 May 2008 (UTC) (moved section in chronological order)[reply]

I think that's fine. If you have enough material to make a start on the "festival" article, that would be great. Once that's done we can see what's there & make the decision. Thanks for chiming in :D E_dog95'^{Hi '} 22:03, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Electric Daisy Carnival (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080319012638/https://www.electricdaisycarnival.com:80/ to http://www.electricdaisycarnival.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:48, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]