Talk:Delta baryon

Hadron overhaul

Please give input at Talk:Hadron#Hadron overhaul. Thanks. Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 01:57, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decay

Why are Delta-1 and Delta-0 unstable if uud and udd respectively are their constituents? Aren't they just protons and neutrons? After all, the constituents are identical, how are they different? 32ieww (talk) 02:45, 30 January 2017 (UTC) 32ieww (talk) 02:45, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Because they're excited forms of the nucleons. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 15:44, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delta++ and Delta-

Why are there no stable uuu or ddd baryons? XinaNicole (talk) 08:32, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because they all decay via strong interactions (e.g. Δ⁺⁺ → p⁺ + π⁺). See Decay modes, on the 5th page. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 14:24, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why not $\Delta ^{2+}$ ?

Because $\Delta ^{2+}$ looks pretty straightforward given p⁺ and u^2⁄3+. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 15:43, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what you're asking here. There is a Delta⁺⁺... Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:54, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not that there does that particle exist or not, but that why isn't it

\Delta ^{2+}

instead of

\Delta ^{++}

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Alfa-ketosav (talk • contribs) 20:39, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

$\Delta ^{-}$ not observed

Nowhere is it mentioned that the $\Delta ^{-}$ has never been observed in experiments. Especially for the table, there should at least be a note. Frogjg2003 (talk) 06:52, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is the spin information really correct?

I'm not an expert but as far as I'm aware I've never heard of baryons having spin greater than 3/2. They have three quarks each with 1/2, so how could they possibly go beyond that? The baryon article doesn't seem to talk about any such thing either. PointlessUsername (talk) 03:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]