Talk:Death grip

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has not yet been associated with a particular area.

Swimming Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Swimming, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Swimming on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwimmingWikipedia:WikiProject SwimmingTemplate:WikiProject Swimmingswimming
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disagreement?

This page disagrees with the page Instinctive drowning response. Kczaj (talk) 21:19, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recommend for rewording to avoid gendered pronoun.

I accidentally came across this article and made edit to use gender-neutral pronoun, until I pay some attention and notice from the beginning until edit 1021237219, the pronoun used in this article was "they/their", until user L.T.G made 3 consecutive edits and the only thing he/she did is to force use the she/her pronoun, accusing other edits as "unconstructive" and stating that "singlular they is “looked down upon” and “not recommended by wiki manual”", while not able to provide the reference to the "recommendation" part in any so-called "wiki manual". In fact, there is no consensus mandate nor against the use of singular they, let alone "not recommended by wiki manual". There is an essay on Wikipedia:Gender-neutral_language which clearly instructed editors to better rewording to avoid using particular pronoun, pluralise, or specifically use the phrase "he or she". I have pluralised the sentence as a hot fix, but place this discussion here until the editors reach a consensus on this one and notice newcomers that this problem has been discussed before in case there's further editor war. 🤪🪱 22:08, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]