Talk:Dawn of Mana

Dawn of Mana has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Dawn of Mana is part of the Mana series series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 7, 2015	Good article nominee	Listed
August 11, 2015	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

GameRevolution (2 participants)
List of longest-running video game franchises (10 participants)
Atomas (1 participant)
PLAY: The Games Festival (3 participants)
FloodSim (3 participants)
Kunimitsu and Kunimitsu II (2 participants)
Blast Monkeys (2 participants)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (6 participants)
Free Internet Chess Server (9 participants; relisted)
Gilman Louie (3 participants; relisted)
Yoshimitsu (5 participants; relisted)
Emote (3 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Untitled

This article is in serious need of updating. The game's already been out in Japan since December 21st.

I'd add to it if I had the game.--Claude 07:06, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have the game but I don't write very well. If someone wants to help me I'll be glad to fill out as much as possible. I don't have a wiki account so I'll use my e-mail to ID my posts.- Mikari@gmail.com

EU release date

Is this game ever coming out in europe? And if so, when ? :( Captain duck 13:57, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plot summary

The plot summary seems about right so I've removed the {{plot}} tag. --Tony Sidaway 21:16, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stroud and Mavolia

King Stroud (Dark Lord) was a prince in the first game. Even then, he and other Mavoles (devils/demons) were seeking to return to Mavolia. Lord Granz, who was considered a "good" character, remarked that "humans and Mavoles could be friends". In fact, Granz married Medusa, who was a Mavole. Also, in first game, a Dracula-styled boss was asked by Lord Granz to "protect those women". Heroine of the first game was the final candidate for the Bride. The Heroine's version of the game plot reveals that Stroud mistakenly believes that Mana clan betrayed Medusa and other Mavoles. Overall, Mavoles are not necessarily evil - but are considered evil by most people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.34.22.41 (talk) 22:47, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your point? Larrythefunkyferret (talk) 04:48, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Point of telling about Medusa/Dark Lord - Yura87 (talk) 16:00, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Point of that big chunk of text was that info on Stroud seeking to return to Mavolia should be put to general Mana series article rather than to Dawn of Mana game.

It seems important to this article as well, as it explains Stroud's motive for his actions. Feel free to put it in the series article, though, if you think it will help. Larrythefunkyferret (talk) 02:48, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Dawn of Mana/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ProtoDrake (talk · contribs) 20:49, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get back with comments and such in a day or two. If three days pass and I haven't done anything, please drop a reminder. --ProtoDrake (talk) 20:49, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review

@PresN: Having looked through the article, checked links and such, I can't see anything outstanding that stops me from giving this article an instant Pass. Did not expect it, and was a very refreshing change. --ProtoDrake (talk) 09:52, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]