Talk:Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon: Sword of Destiny
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A fact from Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon: Sword of Destiny appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 December 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Article says throughout that the title of the film is Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon - The Green Legend and Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon II: The Green Legend. However, the article's title has the subtitle listed as Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon: Sword of Destiny. Very contradictory three titles. So... What's the title? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wufan10304 (talk • contribs) 03:51, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
IMDb has the language of this movie listed as English while the infobox on this article says Mandarin. The trailer has English narration suggesting the movie will be in English. Davidreid (talk) 06:03, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Stormedelf: I have reverted your poster change twice now. The poster I uploaded does have the date on it, contrary to your edit summary, and it's the US theatrical poster for a primarily American film. — Film Fan10:46, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This is not primarily an American film, its a co-production between USA (The Weinstein Company) and China (China Film Group). I see the date now but the poster is not the theatrical one since it only shows the back of a person. Posters usually show the faces of the cast. Stormedelf (talk) 12:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There is no reason why the Chinese poster should replace the American one. Saying it's not the theatrical poster because it doesn't show the cast's faces is about the silliest argument I've ever heard and is complete baseless nonsense. Also, when you do have a valid reason to replace a poster, you're supposed to upload it on top of the original file, using the same filename. — Film Fan16:49, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
