Jump to content

Talk:Gujrat District

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Chokar Kalan)

my name wasim akhtar (haji) i belong to main dhaki darwaza and i am very surprise to see this website and i would like to thanks those people who make this website. it is my plesue to share some with you. i ask some here, if you want to make more beautiful this site you have to added some beatiful picture's of our four gates and our heroes like shaheed's and polition and our famous industries

thanks a lot

wasim akhtar ( haji)

0092-301-6252093

Schools in Gujrat

[edit]

Govt Comprehensive School of Gujrat —Preceding unsigned comment added by Imranbaig (talkcontribs) 18:57, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

added WP Pakistan tag. This article should me merged with Gujrat.Najafhaider (talk) 17:51, 14 March 2009 (UTC) Jinnah Public School Gujrat is one of the famous schools in gujrat. It is in a village hafiz Hayat near university of the Gujrat.[UOG]. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.152.14.63 (talk) 09:51, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sikh Era Has No References

[edit]

The entire section relating to the Sikh era is unsourced and I notice that there is a tag for removal from July of this year. I will be checking on this page sometime in mid August to check if the appropriate sources have been provided. After reviewing the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability#Burden_of_evidence, I think that the section could most likely be removed in its entirety right now but will instead give notice before removal. The information is not only uncited, it is very biased with a mixture of fact and history. I am aware of the Jihad against the Sikhs by the Muslims of Punjab and its failure, but it should be cited. What is most alarming about the paragraph is the claims that Muslim sites were looted to construct the Harmandir Sahib. The sentence is not only inaccurate as it was constructed a few centuries before the alleged looting but also because even if it was a misstatement relating to the beautification of the Harmandir Sahib with marble and gold, its a claim which has been uncited. According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability#Burden_of_evidence, one of the main points of reliable sources is to ensure that existing groups are protected from being slandered and without even a single citation for the entire paragraph this is exactly what is happening.

I hope I have made the reasons for my action clear and scholarly. Thank you.

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gujrat District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:45, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gujrat District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:13, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]