Talk:Charlotte Whitton

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Feminism Mid‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Ottawa Mid‑importance

	Ontario portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ottawa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ottawa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OttawaWikipedia:WikiProject OttawaTemplate:WikiProject OttawaOttawa articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Since the person this article is about has been dead since 1975, would it not be normal usage to refer to her in the past tense? (as in 'Charlotte Whitton was..." rather than "is". Marty55 02:46, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Old Ottawa Flag.png

Image:Old Ottawa Flag.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:00, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

lesbian

Is there prove that Charlotte Whitton was a lesbian? Demophon (talk) 20:45, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another ref

Not sure this is considered RS: http://www.dailyxtra.com/toronto/charlotte-loved-margaret-57245, but its at the top of the google search Ottawahitech (talk) 14:35, 31 October 2016 (UTC)please ping me[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charlotte Whitton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100826001847/http://www.ottawacitizen.com:80/opinion/Recognize+Charlotte+Whitton+dark+side/3402817/story.html to http://www.ottawacitizen.com/opinion/Recognize+Charlotte+Whitton+dark+side/3402817/story.html#ixzz0wmLWgXvf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:20, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Charlotte Whitton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:12, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charlotte Whitton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:18, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT categories

I note that at some point in the past couple of years, this article was added to Category:Lesbian politicians and Category:20th-century LGBT people, so I'm leaving this note here to clarify that this is not appropriate.

While it certainly seems likely to modern eyes that her relationship with Margaret Grier was probably a lesbian one, the evidence for that is not conclusive and has remained a subject of unresolved debate. Boston marriages, for the record, were not always lesbian spousal relationships, and did sometimes take place between heterosexual or asexual women who just didn't have husbands for some other reason as well — it really was sometimes just a Kate & Allie "sharing a household to save money" sort of thing, rather than always being a lesbian couple — so the mere fact that Whitton and Grier lived in that kind of arrangement is not in and of itself definitive. Their letters have been debated, but there hasn't been any sort of consensus of scholars established one way or the other.

As well, regardless of whether they were a lesbian couple or not, Whitton certainly never came out as lesbian in a modern sense, so it simply isn't clearcut as to what her sexual orientation was or wasn't, as she simply never claimed any sexual orientation label in her own public words.

So for all of those reasons, there just aren't the grounds to categorize her as lesbian. And this isn't homophobia talking; I'm an openly gay man who actively tries to contribute to Wikipedia's coverage of LGBTQ topics, and the question of whether we can definitively prove that Charlotte Whitton was a lesbian or not has long been on my radar as something to look into. But the evidence simply isn't definitive enough to describe or categorize her as a lesbian: with the sources that exist at present, the only thing we can do is acknowledge and describe the debate, and it would be original research for us to treat her sexual orientation as a settled matter. Bearcat (talk) 14:01, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]