Talk:Catherine Herridge

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 June 2018. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Legal Dispute

Is that really worth recording here? It doesn't seem worth the space here. 155.213.224.59 (talk) 18:14, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Catherine Herridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:30, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"seized files"

here's some popcorn to chew while we watch the drama unfold:

In any event, the allegation that CBS News “seized” Herridge’s files, the catalyst for all this drama, is in dispute. Several CBS News sources I spoke to said that, after returning some personal effects—clothes, books, awards, etcetera—Herridge’s office had been locked and her files untouched. They also said the company had been trying to coordinate the return of her files via a representative, but that neither Herridge nor said representative had responded. Sources close to Herridge argue that CBS News only agreed to release the files after this public pressure campaign; sources close to the leadership say Herridge is purposely delaying the retrieval of her files in order to advance the idea that she’s being unfairly victimized.

In a statement on Thursday, CBS News spokesperson Christa Robinson confirmed the network was “awaiting a response from Catherine and/or her representative.” She added, “We have respected her request to not go through the files, and out of our concern for confidential sources, the office she occupied has remained secure since her departure.” On Friday, Robinson followed up to put a finer point on it, writing: “CBS News strongly denies any items were seized.”[1]

soibangla (talk) 09:31, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]