Talk:Caerphilly

Wales Mid‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article needs census data.

Error

Is it Glemorgan or Gwent? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.45.237.154 (talk • contribs).

The county situation is complicated, as the system of local government has changed several times, but different organisations (and often the general public as well) retain the use of historic subdivisions no longer used administratively. Caerphilly is even more confusing because it lies on the boundary between traditional counties, and appears to have been west of the border originally, and then placed east of the border when a new system came in several decades ago. I've tried to clarify the situation, but I'm a little confused by it myself! Joe D (t) 14:56, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joe, you are right to be confused. The only way to please everyone is to say "both". There are different systems for different purposes. The town is entirely west of the Rhymney and therefore in Glamorgan (Bedwas, Trethomas and Machen east of the Rhymney are separate towns in Monmouthshire). Since 2003 Caerphilly comes under the lieutenancy area of Gwent. Fortunately the present system of Lieutenancy areas and historic counties use different and unambiguous names so it's quite easy to separate the two apart. The same unfortunately cannot be said for the present system of local government areas, which are a mix of some areas with the same name as towns, some with the same name as historic counties and some with the same name as lieutenancy areas! Owain (talk) 14:26, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

South Wales?

Weisinger, please quote the exact phrase in (Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements) that indicates that 'South Wales' is not to be used as a geographical area. Thank you. ♦ Jongleur100 ♦ ^talk 22:49, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Economic decline

According to http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/markeaston/2008/11/mapof_the_week_1.html , it's the only area in England and Wales whose wealth went down over the last 5 years... AnonMoos (talk) 20:15, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

404! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.138.86.250 (talk) 10:35, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

name confusion

Hello, is there any thing that can be put in the article or any source of information as to why the name appears to be half welsh, half English? This has confused me for a while, when I read caer, I am reading in welsh mode, then I get to philly and it throws me. It's very weird. Why is it that when the name was Anglicised, they didn't also Anglicise caer to car? Like in Caerdydd? Surely the English name should be Carphilly? Drag-5 (talk) 13:55, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Caerphilly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120124144324/http://www.roman-britain.org/places/caerphilly.htm to http://www.roman-britain.org/places/caerphilly.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:25, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sister/Twinned Cities?

Caerphilly is twinned with Písek, Czech Republic and Ludwigsburg, Germany. We appear in these towns’ Wikipedia articles but they do not appear in ours. Perhaps it would be prudent to include a category for this? It would also be interesting to explain some of the effects of this partnership if anyone is willing to do the research. 2A01:4C8:69:31D:7D3E:EFD6:7158:5942 (talk) 16:46, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]