Talk:Cabaret (British TV programme)

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Television: British Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Requested move 3 January 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) samee converse 13:41, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cabaret (British TV series) → Cabaret (UK TV programme) – Article's lede describes this show as a "live television variety programme". But, admittedly, "variety shows/programmes" can be tricky – if they include skits that consist of "recurring characters" that appear episode-to-episode, then they can qualify as "TV series" under WP:NCTV. But if they're of the "variety show" format where it's just a series of different musical acts from episode to episode, then they are properly "TV programmes" under WP:NCTV. I can't tell which type this one is, but considering it dates to the 1930s, it seems far more likely to be an example of the latter type of "variety show", which would make "TV programme" the correct disambiguator in this case. In addition, as per current NCTV rules (WP:NCTVUK), this should be diambiguated with "UK" not "British". --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:52, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support - This one was very hard to evaluate because all but one of the references are sourced to IMDB, which is not a reliable source per Wikipedia:Citing IMDb. After digging through a few issues of Radio Times, starting with the week of the show's premiere, I'm inclined to think this fits more into the "programme" bucket - more like a marquee during a particular timeslot for various musical acts than a coherent narrative series. -- Netoholic @ 23:08, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support per both nom's and Netoholic's findings. --Gonnym (talk) 11:11, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Agree we use UK over British per The Office (UK TV series), The X Factor (UK TV series), etc., but further to the use of programme or series I'm ambivalent so hoping for some more input on that. Zarcadia (talk) 20:54, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:NCTV goes into the details, but the gist is that "series" have continuing "narrative" (i.e. "story") elements, and "programmes" don't. What NCTV says about the latter is: "Non-series television shows tend to be produced on either an on-going basis (airing daily or weekly) or as a one-time event. Each episode of an on-going show usually is self-contained with little connection to other episodes, other than title, format, hosts, and other on-air personalities. These shows generally lack on-going narrative or story elements." This current case looks a lot like that. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 06:59, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.