Talk:Bo Guagua/Archive 1

Archive 1

"Guagua" vs "Bo"

As much as his notability is attributed and a result of the eminence of his father, I do not think it is appropriate to refer to him as "Guagua" in the article. Instead we should probably just use "Bo" just like Bo Yibo and Bo Xilai. It would be like referring to Justin Bieber as "Justin" in his article purely by virtue of his youth. Colipon+(Talk) 04:18, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

+1. I had a crack at some of the language. Whose idea was it to have so many adjectives? The Sound and the Fury (talk) 16:57, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

That was me. I think it's important that people understand Chongqing is "sprawling." ;) Homunculus (duihua) 20:54, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Image rights?

It's nice that the article has an image, but I don't think it's free use. The image appeared on VOA, but is credited to Reuters. I imagine Reuters holds the copyright. Homunculus (duihua) 06:22, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Delete award section

Any objections? Just read it. Sounds like an AstroTurf award which is being documented through original research. Perhaps better not to mention it at all. The Sound and the Fury (talk) 19:23, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

It's worth mentioning. These awards have been mentioned (albeit in passing) in major news reports about him. But it does seem like overkill to devote a whole section to it, and the details that populate that section seem like overkill. Look through the page history and see what was done before. Might consider some kind of middle ground. Homunculus (duihua) 19:30, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

The section needs wikifying. Agree that some awards might not be so significant and can be condensed. Colipon+(Talk) 19:52, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

It seems to be more than just a formatting issue. These are the two references for the actual award: [1], [2]. It's the same article. So we have one article from the overseas propaganda site China.org. In this context it's SPS. The rest of the section is original research showing how the award was essentially made up. We can do without this. If there's evidence of notability, i.e., "major news reports" then please present it. Right now we have notability, SPS, and OR violations. The Sound and the Fury (talk) 19:53, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

To make things easier I just removed the original research and unsourced claims. Now we are left with the China.org publicity. I think that should be removed too. The Sound and the Fury (talk) 19:55, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, probably the violation we're looking at here is not SPS, because young Bo didn't publish it himself, but it's an RS violation: "Articles should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." China.org is not a reliable, third party source. And it has no reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. The Sound and the Fury (talk) 19:58, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Personally, I don't feel strongly about the awards either way. If it were up to me, I'd mention it in passing, perhaps a few sentences. But they don't add too much to the article. It is true that young Bo has been recognized, and China.org may not be a good source for this. But I've read it in RS. Don't want to comb through it now though; it's not all that important in the grand scheme. Colipon+(Talk) 20:05, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

those are not "original research", those are facts. if any of those things are not FACTS, you can delete it as much as you want. just like 1+1 = 2, it is a fact, not an original research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CC6B:6B90:953E:CF78:4C31:415F (talk) 20:32, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Actually, even "1+1=2" would have to be sourced if it were to be cited in a Wikipedia article.... The Sound and the Fury (talk) 21:10, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Please read the WP:OR policy. I'm again removing the original research. If you add it again, 2602:306:CC6B:6B90:953E:CF78:4C31:415F|, we can start some kind of dispute resolution proceeding to gain a definitive conclusion. The Sound and the Fury (talk) 21:14, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

By the way, this is a biography of a living person, so there are stricter rules about inclusion of content and neutral tone. Please discuss further changes. The Sound and the Fury (talk) 21:16, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

stop saying "original research", show me where they are, and tell me why they are NOT facts. go ahead. do it. stop vandalizing the page! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CC6B:6B90:953E:CF78:4C31:415F (talk) 21:26, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi IP user: I'm trying to get clear on what's going on here. If appears that you have added this section back onto the page[3]. There are legitimate concerns that what you've done is original research per WP:OR, which is prohibited. You may want to read that policy. The things that you have written about the status of these websites and the authenticity of the award may be true, but Wikipedia requires that verifiability, and statements challenged or likely to be challenged should be supported with reliable (ideally secondary) sources. You've written, for instance, that "after 2009, British Chinese Youth Federation web site (http://www.bcyf.org.uk) has ceased to operate. Their other web site ukbcyf.org was abandoned in 2010." The only source given is a link to a web archive. Other statements you added have no source at all. Is there a published news article somewhere that describes this controversy? Homunculus (duihua) 21:37, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

[edit conflict] It's difficult if you haven't read the policy. Please read the policy on reliable sources and original research WP:RS and WP:OR. I'll give you some time to process those pages. The point is that we can't go out and figure out for ourselves the background of this award. We have to cite it to a source. Someone has to publish this information in a reliable source. If we link to the website to show that it is closed down, making a comment meant to show this, that's original research. Regarding the headline, it is just long and awkward. Please let me know when you have finished reading those content policy pages. In the meantime, this is a biography of a living person and we have unsourced information on it. The Sound and the Fury (talk) 21:39, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

if you have "free" time to vandalize, i suggest you to edit this page. stop deleting the entire section. if any of the things are NOT facts, feel free to delete them. if you have time to read policy, i am certain that you MUST have the time to edit this page.

once again, if any of your so-called "original research" is not the truth, feel free to delete them. otherwise, stop calling those facts as "original research", that makes you look like bo guagua's personal publicist.

and go to: http://www.bcyf.org.uk, were you not able to go to that site and see it for yourself, is it still the "british chinese youth federation" or not? does it have ANY information about bcyf any more? is it still operating under its name? unless you are blind, i am sure that you can see that that web site is not functional any more.

what are my "Other statements" that you can't find proof. do you need me to take a picture in order to show you that those are facts? those things are not what you wrote "may be true", they are the truth. i challenge you to verify any of those things are not true.

once again, if any of your so-called "original research" is not the truth, feel free to delete them. otherwise, stop calling those facts as "original research", that makes you look like bo guagua's personal publicist.

the name of the fake award

that is the name that was given to him, this is actually the longer version "EF∙Royal Cornell 2009 Big Ben Award and Ten Outstanding Chinese Young Persons Selection in the UK Charity Ceremony". no matter how you feel if it is award or not, but he was the one who accepted it in a hotel in london, not in a public institute or a government building. just look at the top picture on this page, you will see it. http://www.china.org.cn/china/features/content_17791048.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CC6B:6B90:953E:CF78:4C31:415F (talk) 22:48, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Please acquaint yourself with our biographies of living persons policy, our no original research policy, and our neutral point of view policy before making any further edits to this page. These are not negotiable. It is perfectly obvious from your edits what your point of view is on this person -- you labeled him a criminal under investigation in the very first line of the article, and without a source -- if you are truly editing from a neutral point of view if should be impossible to tell. Thank you. Antandrus (talk) 23:07, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

then you still can't call it "vandalism", and you can't prove ANYTHING that i wrote is NOT true. go ahead, prove it to me that any part that I added was "vandalism". this is ridiculous. you can verify everything i wrote with those web sites that i added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CC6B:6B90:9DC7:EFBF:B01:ECB9 (talk) 00:38, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I just stumbled into this discussion, but I just wanted to say that logic dictates that the 'burden of proof' is always with the side making a claim of something being a fact. Translated to Wikipedia, it only makes sense that it is the responsibility of a person making edits to provide enoguh sources for what they type; it is not the other way around; the burden of proof is not with the people who say that you didn't provide enough sourcing. Finally, and this maybe against some guideline of "assuming good faith", but the fact that you constantly type without punctuation and choose to remain semi-anonymous (without logging in; all everyone can see is your IP-adress) and call everyone who disagrees with you a pro-communist, does not exactly inspire confidence. RagingR2 (talk) 13:29, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

-- Here are the things that got deleted by the pro-communist administrators.

EF∙Royal Cornell 2009 Big Ben Award and Ten Outstanding Chinese Young Persons Selection in the UK Charity Ceremony

According to Taiwan Apple Daily newspaper, the award he won was entirely fake.

On May 9th of 2009, a charity organisation registered in UK - British Chinese Youth Federation (BCYF), whose owner is Yinya Li from city of Fuzhou of Fujian province, gave Bo Guagua an award during the first annual "EF∙Royal Cornell 2009 Big Ben Award and Ten Outstanding Chinese Young Persons Selection in the UK Charity Ceremony (TOCYP-UK)". at Le Meridien Hotel Piccadilly in London. No one from the UK government or any UK royals were present during this ceremony, but Chinese Consul Jin Shihong and his wife, the director of the Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office in London - Hu Baozhu, representatives from the Malaysian Embassy, the Taipei Representative Office and Singapore attended the ceremony.

The five judges were: Lord Tom Pendry, Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office in London - Hu Baozhu, Chairman of 48 Group Club Stephen Perry, Dr Xiaojiu Zhu who doesn't have a law degree who was hired as a legal counsel and to provide notary service for BCYF. , and the owner of BCYF.

Marco Fu was also given the award, even though he lives in Hong Kong, and is a Canadian permanent resident. Daniel Jacoel who was the chairman of the 48 Group Club Young Icebreakers, was also given an award.

Let Me Be Me performed during the event. This event was only widely reported by news media in mainland China. Most mainland Chinese were given the impression that he won the award that was given by the UK government.

After 2009, British Chinese Youth Federation second web site (http://www.bcyf.org.uk) has ceased to operate. Their first web site ukbcyf.org expired. The web site of second annual EF∙Royal Cornell Big Ben Awards for the Top Ten Outstanding Young Chinese in the UK was moved to a web site based in China. . Meanwhile, Big Ben Award Corporation started to offer awards to Chinese all over the world. Its English page is still empty. Their Chinese page "Contact Us" has no name, phone number or email address listed. Both web sites are registered to Yinya Li. The current address for "Big Ben Award Corporation" is located in a dental office in London.

bo guagua's nationality is UNKNOWN.

I doubt he holds both US and UK PR cards, especially the later, it's said that his mother Gu Kailai is UK PR card holder, therefore he's entitled to apply for PR according to relative law of UK. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.67.139.239 (talk) 09:39, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

his student visa expired in 60 days after his graduation in May of 2012, where he is, no one knows. you can't prove that he is currently in china, either. so if he is staying in the usa legally or illegally, no one knows. therefore, you can't say that his nationality is chinese unless you can prove it.

Nationality is not defined by one's current place of residence. Homunculus (duihua) 14:10, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

that is right. but he is assuming still living in the usa, and if he has a student visa, that expired after 60 days after he graduated. therefore, either he is an illegal alien or he has a green card.

how can wikipedia prove that he still has ａchinese passport? did you people see it in person?

I do not know what kind of visa Guagua holds, but it is not the case that the only two options are as a green card holder or an illegal alien. There are a number of other visas he may have obtained that do not automatically confer a green card (eg. a work visa). Besides, having a green card would not make him a U.S. national, and would not imply the revocation of his Chinese citizenship or nationality. If he obtains American citizenship in the future, it's a different story. Until proven otherwise, he remains a Chinese national. Homunculus (duihua) 01:20, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

you must be naive. there are plenty of chinese communist party members who actually have foreign passports, they won't openly admit it, because they still want to stay in the party, so they can make more money.

for a person like bo guagua, he has lived in UK since when he was 11 or so. actress Jane chen was born in china, but she is a usa citizen now. so for wikipedia to assume that because bo was born in china, therefore he has a chinese passport. that is assumption. it is in total violation of wikipedia's own rules! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CC6B:6B90:211E:52CF:F0B5:F87F (talk) 13:11, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

$100,000 paid for guagua.com is not added, what is the reason?

this part was also deleted by the pro-communist administrators.

In 2010, he paid $100,000 to buy guagua.com from Antonio Marin, a 53-year-old university administrator from Tenerife, Spain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CC6B:6B90:4D70:9DFC:84BF:5CEF (talk) 00:53, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

The fellow who reverted you is not an administrator. Also, please refrain from commenting on what you believe to be the ideological orientation of other users.

Some of the information that you added is valid and reasonably well supported (there are better reliable sources available for the above, by the way; use the Guardian[4] rather than wantchinatimes.com). I might have framed some of these issues differently than you, but the information itself is fine and policy compliant. Some of the other material that you wrote is more questionable. You need to be wary of conducting WP:Original research, and also of giving undue weight to one aspect of the topic, especially in biography of living persons. As such, a lengthy section about the big ben award probably does not belong here. If you want, you could request an article about the award itself, provided there are enough sources on it. That would be my suggestion. The Tea house is a good place to ask for advice if you have any questions.

Also, in the future, you might consider proposing changes on the talk page and asking more experienced editors to review them and offer feedback. Homunculus (duihua) 14:21, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

this is plain simple very lame! what I added is 100% true, and i quoted from a web site. how can you people not add it, and call it "vandalism"? you explain it to me. which part was incorrect or untrue? show me.

also, this page was put under protection AGAIN for "vandalism"! how ridiculous is that? which part is "vandalized"! show me the proof!

I do not believe that what you wrote was vandalism. Vandalism refers to deliberate attempts at disruption, and I am trying to assume that you are acting in good faith. The editor who reverted you on those grounds misused the term. Anyways, there's no need for the chip on your shoulder. You will find that, if you propose content for inclusion on the talk page in a calm and constructive way, and seek the advice of experienced editors, you will usually find people willing to try to help broker a compromise. Homunculus (duihua) 01:03, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

good, go ahead, add this part to the article then. let's see if those admins will call you vandalizing this page again! won't that be funny? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CC6B:6B90:211E:52CF:F0B5:F87F (talk) 13:09, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Big Ben Award

[5]

here are the evidence to prove that what he deleted are all based on the truth.

1. the British Chinese Youth Federation whose Website has expired. [bcyf.org.uk bcyf expired web page] 2. the Big Ben Award Corporation whose web site has no contact information contact us has no email, no phone number, no address. --Bgggongfei (talk) 23:37, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Penal exams

In the Oxford University section the article states that Bo was "made to sit penal exams for failing to maintain his grades". I don't think that exams are a punishment, and it should say something like "was required to sit further exams to maintain his grades". Although I could be wrong. Britmax (talk) 09:18, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Chinese communist spies deleted the following section once again!

And it just shows wikipedia is full of chinese communist spies. Everything was the truth, but wikipedia can't handle the truth.

Extended content

EF∙Royal Cornell 2009 Big Ben Award and Ten Outstanding Chinese Young Persons Selection in the UK Charity Ceremony According to Taiwan Apple Daily newspaper, the award he won was entirely fake. On May 9th of 2009, a charity organisation registered in UK - British Chinese Youth Federation (BCYF http://www.bcyf.org.uk/) which the web site stopped operating after this award was given. The address registered for this organization was in a ghetto in London. The owner is Yinya Li (李引亞, English name: Jonsson Li) from city of Fuzhou of Fujian province, gave Bo Guagua an award during the first annual "EF∙Royal Cornell 2009 Big Ben Award and Ten Outstanding Chinese Young Persons Selection in the UK Charity Ceremony (TOCYP-UK)". at Le Meridien Hotel Piccadilly in London. No one from the UK government or any UK royals were present during this ceremony, but Chinese Consul Jin Shihong and his wife, the director of the Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office in London - Hu Baozhu, representatives from the Malaysian Embassy, the Taipei Representative Office and Singapore attended the ceremony. The five judges were: Lord Tom Pendry, Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office in London - Hu Baozhu, Chairman of 48 Group Club Stephen Perry, Dr Xiaojiu Zhu who doesn't have a law degree who was hired as a legal counsel and to provide notary service for BCYF. She finished her biological education in the USA, then moved to the UK to work for a solicitor who immigrated from New Zealand to the UK. and the owner of BCYF - Yinya Li. The official sponsors include: the Chinese embassy in the UK, All China Youth Federation (http://www.qinglian.org) under the control of the Chinese Communist Party, China Central Television, Phoenix Television and a free Chinese newspaper called 倫敦時報 (The London Times) not to be confused with the actual The London Times. The sponsoring media was Jonsson Li Publishing House (「歐金出版局（倫敦）」) whose owner is the same person of this award. 。 Marco Fu was also given the award, even though he lives in Hong Kong, and is a Canadian permanent resident. Daniel Jacoel who was the chairman of the 48 Group Club Young Icebreakers, was also given an award. Let Me Be Me performed during the event. This event was only widely reported by news media in mainland China. Most mainland Chinese were given the impression that he won the award that was given by the UK government. After 2009, British Chinese Youth Federation second web site (http://www.bcyf.org.uk) has ceased to operate. Their first web site ukbcyf.org expired. The web site of second annual EF∙Royal Cornell Big Ben Awards for the Top Ten Outstanding Young Chinese in the UK was moved to a web site based in China. Meanwhile, Big Ben Award Corporation started to offer awards to Chinese all over the world. Its English page is still empty. Their Chinese page "Contact Us" has no name, phone number or email address listed. Both web sites are registered to Yinya Li. The current address for "Big Ben Award Corporation" is located in a dental office in London.。

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:cc6b:6b90:6c25:47e7:120a:9bfb (talk • contribs) 11:55, 7 February 2013‎

The content you are adding is not cited to reliable third party sources. You are attempting to make personal analysis of primary sources to develop a conclusion. This is a violation of multiple Wikipedia policies: WP:BLP, WP:NOR, and WP:RS being the primary three. Your comments are also failing to assume good faith, and making personal attacks on other editors, which is a violation of WP:AGF and WP:NPA. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 18:02, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

In your entire wall of text, I see one sentence and source that may meet site policies - and which established editors could still add to the article. But I'll leave it to others to discuss before adding it. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 18:09, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Please stop making personal attacks on other users. This is against our policies and is not likely to help achieve any improvement in this article. Rmhermen (talk) 22:34, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Everything is based on truth. and here is the chinese magazine news article about this FAKE AWARD谁参与了薄瓜瓜大本钟奖骗局？. i am surprised that now this award information is entirely deleted from the article.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bo Guagua. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130929082629/http://space.tv.cctv.com/article/ARTI1248414076233699 to http://space.tv.cctv.com/article/ARTI1248414076233699
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130823011430/http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?id=20120319000101&cid=1601 to http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?id=20120319000101&cid=1601
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120824233428/http://news.longhoo.net/2012-03/11/content_8696125.htm to http://news.longhoo.net/2012-03/11/content_8696125.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:36, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bo Guagua. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120605054413/http://www.infzm.com/content/30857 to http://www.infzm.com/content/30857

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:12, 7 November 2017 (UTC)