Talk:Blue Book (magazine)

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blue Book (magazine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090503032919/http://www.violetbooks.com:80/gal-erb.html to http://www.violetbooks.com/gal-erb.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:18, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Opening Paragraphs Problem

I have tried to go through the opening paragraphs three times now, and was able to absorb next to no information besides "this magazine had a lot of different names" (and that it appealed to both genders). This should not be the leading information about the magazine, as it does not give any useful information by which to understand what the magazine was actually about. Please move the names down to a later section and recreate the opening paragraphs to give a succinct view of why this magazine managed to attain such a high rank as being among the Big Four. Kilyle (talk) 09:35, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]