This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Azerbaijan-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijan
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (country), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Georgia and Georgians on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (country)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (country)Template:WikiProject Georgia (country)Georgia (country)
Why we need two different maps if the first ma shows the whole route of the pipeline and the second one only the Georgian section? I propose to preserve only the first one.Beagel (talk) 19:58, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The second map was added to show a more detailed view of the pipeline as it passes through Georgia, which is, as the last sentence of the History section now indicates, militarily-contested in the war in South Ossetia. It is also the case that the second map base layer shows much more city-level detail to help one ascertain the pipeline route. N2e (talk) 20:09, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The length of the pipeline seems to be average: 830 km in the article while the Azeri source says 837 km. I think the best way would be to refer to the operator's website where it is at 833 km. I am changing it to BP's information. Please make your suggestions if you think otherwise. Tuscumbia (talk) 21:14, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
