Talk:BD Wong

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the BD Wong article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Asian Americans Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Asian Americans (assessed as Low-importance).

LGBTQ+ studies: Person

	LGBTQ portal This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
	This article is supported by the LGBTQ+ Person task force.

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Television: Awake Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Awake task force (assessed as High-importance).

use of term "openly gay"

Is the term "openly" superfluous in this (and other) articles? I would assume that if someone is identified publicly, such as in Wikipedia, as "gay", it's assumed that the person identifies as such, and is therefore "openly" gay. Perhaps this should be a case in which we simply use the word "gay", and if someone is not "out of the closet", terminology should simply indicate that there is speculation that someone is gay, with citations, of course.

The use of "openly gay" does indicate, to me, that there is some shame in being gay, and therefore someone who is "openly gay" has chosen to escape this shame. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Redheaded dude (talk • contribs) 18:00, 5 March 2006.

I realize that this was an incredibly old comment, but since the text is still there, I thought it might be best to include a response (just to discourage anyone from removing the line in the future).

It is true that Wikipedia typically only identifies people as being gay if they admit it themselves (and rightly so). However, there are two things to keep in mind:

First off, the average reader may not necessarily know that.

Second, and I think this may be more pertinent... There are some actors (well, and people in general) who either start off "in the closet", or who are even 'outed' after their deaths. Similarly, some people "come out" even after eeeverybody knows that they're gay. I could (very easily) be wrong, but I don't see anything in the article to suggest that he's ever pretended to be straight, or been secretive about it. If that's false, then it may warrant rewording.

Anyways, just my take on it, for future reference. :) 209.90.135.148 (talk) 03:11, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's 2009, "gay" is sufficient. To add "openly" suggests there's something wrong with being gay, which is an offensive thing to suggest at this point. If there needs to be clarity around whether someone is in the closet, do it with exposition. 212.56.101.47 (talk) 11:26, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What does this mean?: "He has since broken up with his partner and turned a 'straight' life" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.96.188.234 (talk • contribs) 05:07, 25 June 2006.

Openly is a nuance which culturally signifies more than just a state of being. In this case we have someone who uses their career and public image to support LGBT issues/causes. Someday it will indeed be absolutely no big deal to be LGBT but until then these nuances are made. -- Banjeboi 12:17, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I personally disagree with "openly" being offensive, but it is redundant to use "openly" here as if he wasn't an openly gay man, it wouldn't even be mentioned in the article. So either he's gay or not, not openly or straight, or in the closet. --Mike Allen ^{talk · contribs} 18:42, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bdwong.jpg

mispelling of vanity fair in photograph acknowledgement

Image:Bdwong.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:19, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on B. D. Wong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:48, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

B. D. or BD? Question at Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard

See Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#BD_Wong_/_Name_Misspelled_in_Article_Headline. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:14, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]