Talk:Human uses of animals/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Icebob99 (talk · contribs) 16:20, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll be doing the review. I'll list a section with any concerns that must be addressed, as well as a section with my optional suggestions.

Nothing stands out.

In the second sentence of the lead: animals provide much of the meat consumed by the human population? I can't think of any meat that doesn't come from animals; perhaps reword that.
Article is of sufficiently broad coverage for GA status, but it is only 8kB readable prose, and I think 10kB is a good target to aim for. It certainly doesn't fail for my arbitrary preference, and it's more of an A class standard anyway, but expansion at this stage is always a good thing.

Checking against the criteria:

Well written: good layout, well-wikilinked
Verifiable: All the references check out and everything is referenced with inline citations (above GA standards)
Broad: Good broadness, doesn't go into needless detail. See optional suggestion about expansion.
Neutral: Good neutrality maintained.
Stable: edit history looks good.
Images: lot of them! Licensing looks good.

Good job on the article. I'm marking this as having officially passed. Congratulations! Icebob99 (talk) 16:20, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]