Talk:Anecdotal value

notability, neologism

It's still not quite clear from the article that the term "anecdotal value" is established as used in the article. It makes me think it might be not notable, particularly that it might be a neologism. A Google scholar] on "anecdotal value" generally uses it in a disparaging way, "only anecdotal value", "no more than anecdotal value" and the like. CRETOG8(t/c) 17:06, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is notable but not yet in online sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Critic11 (talk • contribs) 19:48, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to sign! I was going to add that quantifying anecdotal value is infamously difficult, which is why it is usually disparaged; however, scholars working on Framing are seeking to measure the effect of Av. Critic11 (talk) 20:01, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I hope you're right because I think I'd find it interesting. In the meantime, please leave the notability tag. Obviously you believe it's notable since you've created the article. I (and another earlier editor) aren't convinced yet.CRETOG8(t/c) 14:17, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shirky's cognitive surplus

The connection to Shirky's cognitive surplus needs to be a lot clearer. First, it needs to be clear that the CS concept is notable itself, and a blog entry isn't enough. Then, there needs to be reference to how someone else has made the connection between the two. The connection needs to come from another source, not be made for the first time in this article. CRETOG8(t/c) 14:25, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I'm on it.Critic11 (talk) 19:12, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anecdotal value. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080504082655/http://bailey83221.livejournal.com/87856.html to http://bailey83221.livejournal.com/87856.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:31, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]