This article was nominated for deletion on 9 January 2013. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh
Further to Darkness Shines suggesting that this article does not fit the criteria for WP:GNG, I would like to provide a list of news references to the barrister that highlight his notability:
Finally, I understand this may not be used in the body of an article as being a potential BLP vio, but if admissible on the talk page, I would like to point out that WikiLeaks has a reference to Abdur Razzaq has having received a personal audience with the US Ambassador to Bangladesh in a US cable here (removed link). If this is inadmissible in a talk page, please point out the relevant policy wrt to talk pages, and I will remove it. Thanks. Aminul802 (talk) 19:12, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
They all do mention his name, yes, but I am concerned that they can't serve as some sort of standalone notability. Aminul802, which one would you consider the most significant RS? Dreambeaver(talk)23:33, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I don't really think we need to do anything about it at this time because the sources don't seem to present a strong case to keep the page. Dreambeaver(talk)19:21, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
