Talk:71st United States Congress

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Congress Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) event(s).

Let's put the important stuff in

The "migratory bird act"?!?! Yet the "permanent appropriation act" of 1929 that capped the house membership at 435 members till death do us part; the legislation that did away with all the rules concerning district populations, sizes and shapes and allowed the disenfranchisement of minorities is not mentioned. The apportionment act of 1929 has to be the most horendous assault on the meaning of the United States if America I have ever seen. Yet we see the @)#&*#%*#^ "Migratory bird act" as a major piece of legislation and not a peep about this REPUBLICAN assault on America. I am of the opinion that this one single act is the major contributor to Congressional stagnation in the United States and the major reason for our current "out of control" government. This is NOT a neutral point of view. And it is somewhat _original research_. But I will only place the FACT of this legislation in the "Major legislation" section of the main article. Surely THAT is not taboo. --The Trucker (talk) 06:21, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 71st United States Congress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060601025644/http://www.gpoaccess.gov/serialset/cdocuments/hd108-222/index.html to http://www.gpoaccess.gov/serialset/cdocuments/hd108-222/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:47, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]