This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovenia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Slovenia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SloveniaWikipedia:WikiProject SloveniaTemplate:WikiProject SloveniaSlovenia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
@ThurnerRupert: I suggest moving the article back to the original title. Not only it’s undue in relations title vs. content, but also as only Loibl was mentioned so far. Also, your numbers were 275 l/48 hrs; which is 125l/24 hrs, while ours were 150 l/12 hrs - which translates to 300 l/24 hrs. What are your suggestions? A09 (talk) 08:35, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Dubstar44: i agree why is the title Carinthia and Slovenia floods Carinthia is in Slovenia so should stick with Slovenia floods.
Current title is undue in relation of title vs. content. As previously said, only Loibl was mentioned so far. A09 (talk) 19:33, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The article is incomplete, also not covering the most recent Slovenian events. So the question is, should the title be what the content is of the article at the moment; or should the title be what the complete article should be? An Austrian section with “incomplete section template”/“update template” can easily be added. 109.38.139.34 (talk) 19:37, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Tentative support. It might be too early to tell, as the floods are currently still affecting Croatia, but from what I've seen, Slovenia has borne the brunt of the damage. At the very least, it should be mentioned first. DaßWölf20:57, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support; the current title with Carinthia in the first place, while perhaps technically not wrong, detracts from the gravity of the situation in Slovenia. Flooding in Austria was nothing out of the ordinary, plus, if we were being inclusive, Croatia should be mentioned too - and that would make the title downright confusing. Neighboring areas can still be mentioned in the text with a simpler title. — YerpoEh?17:29, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
oppose, carinthia is used for 2 regions, in austria and slovenia, to distinguish, slovenian carinthia is named with its slovene name in the article, koroska. what i'd prefer would be to name it metereological as done for other depressions or storms. the official name was petar, i put a link now out of 2022–23 European windstorm season. not sure though if "petar", "storm petar", "depression petar", "storm petar (zaccharias)" would be appropriate. ThurnerRupert (talk) 23:49, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: listing both Slovenian Carinthia and Slovenia in the title makes even less sense, and is actually a good argument for renaming. Further, no WP:RS I can find calls this event "storm Petar", not even NDR that you used to support this statement. — YerpoEh?07:00, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Petar is not a Slovenian name and using Croatian name for an event that striked mostly Slovenia is not acceptable. Furthermore, Zaccharia has no correlation to Petar and is confusing to the un-knowing. A09 (talk) 07:45, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
as far as i understood zaccharia was the name of the depression in the north, when petar merged with a depression coming from england? what i also cannot read out of the article, is it really true that slovenia had such a flood already 4 times in the last 30 years? on the north side of the mountains, this was exceptional, nothing comparable measured in the last 30 years at least. if not petar, how the slovene meteorolgists call it, i could not find another name? ThurnerRupert (talk) 22:13, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can’t really comment on names of storms as I have no data at my disposal. You’re right that 4 floods occured in last 30 years, but these were the biggest of them all (speaking both in flooded area as well as financial damages). A09 (talk) 22:15, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I suggest using "Austrian Carinthia" and "Slovenian Carinthia" in place of "Carinthia" and "Koroška [sic]", respectively, to make the article easier to read. DaßWölf21:00, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]