Talk:2020 Tablighi Jamaat COVID-19 hotspot in Pakistan

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2020 Tablighi Jamaat COVID-19 hotspot in Pakistan article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article is written in Pakistani English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

COVID-19 Low‑importance

	COVID-19 portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject COVID-19, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all COVID-19-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to join and to participate in project discussions.COVID-19Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19Template:WikiProject COVID-19COVID-19
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Viruses High‑importance

	Viruses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pakistan Mid‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Pakistani history.
	It is requested that an image or images be included in this article to improve its quality.

Islam Mid‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Pulmonology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Pulmonology task force.

Please open a Merge discussion

Shawnqual Please open a Merge discussion if you want to merge it.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:12, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion was opened right after sometime and I had also hyperlinked it in the box above. Don't understand why someone started it here.--Shawnqual (talk) 23:10, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shawnqual, you are right that having a merge discussion in the target page (2020 coronavirus pandemic in Pakistan) is the right protocol. However, the "Discuss" link in the Merge banner pointed here! I suggest you change the link to the target page, and copy the comments made here to that page. That would solve the problem. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 05:52, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article should be merged with 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Pakistan

Not merged per the discussion. Tessaracter (talk) 12:57, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Propose that this article be merged back to 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Pakistan.VR _talk 05:15, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wait - These kind of articles are best developed as the events unfold. Right now, there is enough material for a rudimentary article. If it turns out that the significance might be limited, it can always be merged later. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 08:58, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as creator of the page, I naturally oppose merge for now. --Saqib (talk) 11:10, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Kautilya3 This is ongoing event passes WP:GNG and has both National and International coverage and hence do not want to rush to merge it .Through it is used for deletion more WP:RAPID is relevant here.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:08, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pharaoh of the Wizards, WP:GNG could also be used for the situation which occurred in the Taftan border area. Huge numbers of pilgrims returned from Iran via this border to Pakistan and went to their respective provinces and districts, similarly spreading the virus into the communities.--Shawnqual (talk) 23:13, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Kautilya3. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:10, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Seems to fail WP:NOTNEWS on its own and better covered in the greater context of the event in the country. SportingFlyer T·C 17:36, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SportingFlyer: This Ijtema has resulted in a large increase in COVID-19 cases in Pakistan so not WP:NOTNEWS IMHO . --Saqib (talk) 10:02, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Such an article is inherently unnecessary as it will likely be a stub compared to the main article. The place in question is neither a province nor a district of the country which could possibly warrant a separate article. The number of confirmed cases stemming from this event are counted in the provincial tallies and not separately either. It would better serve as a section in the main article. If we are to use the logic for creating this article, there must also be an article for the Taftan border situation. Also, See, WP:PAGEDECIDE -to cover a notable topic only as part of a broader page does not in any way disparage the importance of the topic and WP:REDUNDANTFORK.--Shawnqual (talk) 23:16, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Likely to remain a stub? The article stands at 720 odd words. Basic assumption per WP:Stub says that anything above 250 words need not be considered one. Autowikibrowser removes the stub templates from articles that are over 500 words. This is already grown from Stub-class to start-class, so it cannot likely remain a stub. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 22:09, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Keep article. Ytpks896 (talk) 16:00, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support There were many other reasons and hotspots of virus around the world but article of each hotspot is not created yet. For Ex: The News is also circulated that pilgrims from Iran are the hotspot of spreading COVId [1], but article for that topic is not available on wikipidea but still this article created. I mean spreading of virus is by many reasons in the world but not any reason is specicifcally created here. 221.132.118.194 (talk) 14:36, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for now, can be revisited when things calm down. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:41, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

"2020 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Pakistan" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 2020 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Pakistan. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 24#2020 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Pakistan until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 01:34, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]