Talk:2019 Mongolian constitutional crisis

Mongols Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mongols, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mongol culture, history, language, and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MongolsWikipedia:WikiProject MongolsTemplate:WikiProject MongolsMongols articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scope of Crisis in Need of Clarity

Just finished copy/edit and one of the areas that's a bit fuzzy is the original article text pretty clearly delimiting the crisis as the legislation passed between March 25-28, 2019. That would be fine if the article were for the 2019 Mongolian Constitutional Reform or Addendum or something specific to legislation, but considering there are sources linked in the article itself (e.g. https://thediplomat.com/2019/01/mongolias-crisis-of-democracy-continues/) that depict the political unrest happening earlier in 2019 surrounding the same topic of constitutional separation of powers, it seems like the January ousting of Miyegombyn Enkhbold should be considered part of the crisis and not the background preceding it. I suggest we either:

Rename the article so instead of crisis it is clearer that the legislation is the focus
Move the current background content into the main events section as part of the crisis. Then, in the background section, include more information about (1) the torture and murder of Sanjaasürengiin Zorig (2) the SME scandal (3) MANAN, which seems like it might warrant its own article down the road

--Byron Bligh (talk) 14:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]