File talk:Beatles Blackbird.jpg

This file does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

The Beatles

This Beatles-related file is within the scope of WikiProject The Beatles, which focuses on improving coverage of English rock band The Beatles and related topics on Wikipedia. Users who are willing to participate in the project should visit the project page, where they can join and see a list of open tasks.The BeatlesWikipedia:WikiProject The BeatlesTemplate:WikiProject The BeatlesThe Beatles

To-do list:

For WikiProject The Beatles

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles on each Beatle tour (Category:The Beatles concert tours). See: Missing articles.
Expand : The Lost Lennon Tapes, notable radio series which has spawned many bootlegs. Apple Records See also: Adopt an article
Stubs : See: Category:The Beatles song stubs
Update : Pics/Graphics wanted: Kenwood.
Verify : Beatle wives
Other : Project: Add {{WikiProject The Beatles}} to the talk pages of all Beatles-related articles. Send a newsletter to members, canvas for new members and coordinate tasks. Enter articles assessed as stubs onto this list, also list articles needing cleanup and other work here.

This article does not yet have a related to do list. If you can think of any ways to improve the article, why not create one?

This score fragment contains errors, so don't take it too seriously. For example, the A-G elide (slur) on the word "Take" from line 2 is clearly supposed to be a B-A. Also, the rhythmic treatment of the 2nd bar is really odd, for I don't perceive any 'triplitizing' whatsoever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.112.151.156 (talk) 15:59, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You do realise not many people read file talk pages, right? It would be easier to post ur comment on the page Talk:Blackbird (song) instead. --Yeepsi (Talk to me!) 19:09, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]