William Hoskins, chemist and inventor, with daughter Florence and wife Ada Mae (née Mariner), ca. 1885, Chicago, Illinois. Inset from a larger family portrait with elders (which did not have any better resolution - it was simply a pixelated blow-up of the original which was approximately the resolution presented here).

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1930. Public domain works must be out of copyright in both the United States and in the source country of the work in order to be hosted on the Commons. If the work is not a U.S. work, the file must have an additional copyright tag indicating the copyright status in the source country. Note: This tag should not be used for sound recordings.PD-1923Public domain in the United States//commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chemist_William_Hoskins_and_family_ca_1885.png

This work is in the public domain because it was published in the United States between 1930 and 1963, and although there may or may not have been a copyright notice, the copyright was not renewed. For further explanation, see Commons:Hirtle chart and the copyright renewal logs. Note that it may still be copyrighted in jurisdictions that do not apply the rule of the shorter term for US works (depending on the date of the author's death), such as Canada (70 years p.m.a.), Mainland China (50 years p.m.a., not Hong Kong or Macao), Germany (70 years p.m.a.), Mexico (100 years p.m.a.), Switzerland (70 years p.m.a.), and other countries with individual treaties. العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ українська ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Flagging as PD, because picture is approximately 122 years old. It also predates 1923, so it's PD anyway. Furthermore, its first known publication (which does not indicate copyright, anyway; this being a family portrait provided by the family, the copyright would almost certainly have been vested in the family, not the publication they provided the photo to) was in The American magazine, May 1927, but according to this page and incopyright.org archive copy at the Wayback Machine this publication's copyright was not renewed, and neither was the article's individually. Therefore, marking this "PD-US-not_renewed" as well as "PD-old" "PD-US-expired", just to cover the bases. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 14:35, 21 August 2008 (UTC); rev'd. 00:40, 24 September 2021 (UTC)