Talk:Buscemi nonlocality

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 21 December 2024 by reviewer Asilvering (talk · contribs).

Physics

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Notable?

The paper on which this article relies has only 256 cites in G Scholar so I do not think it is sufficiently notable to have an article on it. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:00, 16 November 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Maybe. But the concept appears in the title of a paper published on a major physics journal (the American Physical Society's Physical Review X Quantum, IF 9.3). Also, other principles in quantum theory are based on papers with a similar number of citations: see e.g., No-hiding theorem based on a paper with 222 citations according to G Scholar. Kattulupesku (talk) 12:55, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Otherstuff. Wait for ten years until it is in the textbooks. WP:NOTTHENEWS. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:32, 17 November 2024 (UTC).[reply]

It is in a textbook (https://academic.oup.com/book/36528/chapter/321333073#443494415). It also has a separate section (VIII D) in the Review of Modern Physics on Bell nonlocality (https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.2849). Kattulupesku (talk) 05:09, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any connection with the topic that should be declared under WP:COI? Xxanthippe (talk) 08:30, 17 November 2024 (UTC).[reply]

I'm a researcher in the field, but have no direct interest/benefit from publishing this. I was unsure if it was better to start a new article or add something to Bell's theorem or Quantum nonlocality. 2400:4151:542:5E00:E4BD:6395:5A66:2EBE (talk) 08:48, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the above is still me; I was replying from a browser that wasn't logged in. Kattulupesku (talk) 08:53, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've accepted it through AfC, since we have at least one source here that is so directly responding to the idea that it's right in the title of the article, but that doesn't preclude any kind of merge discussion. As I'm not a physicist I don't have any input to offer in that regard. Cheers. -- asilvering (talk) 01:05, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak locality?

What is the difference from the Buscemi nonlocality and the usual nonlocality (weak locality) of Bell's inequalities? ReyHahn (talk) 09:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are two differences. Operationally, in semiquantum tests (those used in Buscemi nonlocality) the measurement settings are decided by quantum states, whereas in Bell tests the settings are decided by classical programs. Algebraically, while Bell nonlocality is strictly stronger than entanglement (there exist entangled states that are local), Buscemi nonlocality is equivalent to entanglement (Buscemi nonlocal state = entangled state). Kattulupesku (talk) 12:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]