Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 February 13

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
Help desk
< February 12 << Jan | February | Mar >> February 14 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


February 13

02:58:37, 13 February 2019 review of submission by 216.10.217.201


Because I have published the page , but have no idea if it is live yes or not So that's the reason why I submitted it. 216.10.217.201 (talk) 02:58, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted twice now as SPAM Legacypac (talk) 07:09, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:55:38, 13 February 2019 review of submission by Your suraj

08:55:38, 13 February 2019 review of submission by Your suraj


{{SAFESUBST:Void|

Please approve my website for god's sake. This is my project work in college. I won't get good grades until I get this approved. I don't have any COI, I have not exaggerated or undermined the subject. Also, I have only re-written what the references I provided, have mentioned. Please re-consider.

Your suraj (talk) 08:56, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:03:37, 13 February 2019 review of submission by Heris


This article is about a TV show, whose reference is naturally mainly from its original channel's website. A similar show Car SOS is in the same situation, which has main reference from NGC UK. So, why should this one be rejected?

Heris (talk) 09:03, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:36:52, 13 February 2019 review of submission by Silencer17

Hi, really struggling with understanding the notability requirements for this page. The objections have been either that the subject isn't notable or that there aren't sufficient notable sources - and yet the company has been featured at length in numerous respectable sources that are amongst the most important covering the UK tech sector - from Wired (who named us one of Europe's hottest tech companies) to profiles in the Sunday Times, Times, UKTN, Techworld, Computer Weekly, City AM, Evening Standard - etc. These aren't insignificant sources - indeed there aren't really more important ones. In addition, the Market Research Society award cited is one of the most important global awards in the market research field.

From my perspective - and I appreciate I have a conflict of interest that I have declared - Streetbees is generally recognised as one of the most important, well-funded and disruptive start-ups in London, and it's backed by some of Europe's biggest investors, and this is backed up by by numerous independent, credible sources. Which from my perspective means the absence on Wikipedia is confusing. I appreciate there has been a recent crackdown in company pages, but I'd really appreciate someone to take a look at the sourcing and tell me if they still don't think it's credible? Or am I just getting it wrong?

Any advice would be much appreciated. Silencer17 (talk) 11:36, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

12:16:38, 13 February 2019 review of submission by Perfect forever


Perfect forever (talk) 12:16, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


12:17:49, 13 February 2019 review of submission by Perfect forever

i think the reason for rejection was wrong!! please rereview it. Perfect forever (talk) 12:17, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Page was so over the top loaded with promotional BS I've sent it for speedy deletion. Post this crap again and I'll have your account blocked. Legacypac (talk) 06:43, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:03:17, 13 February 2019 review of submission by BOVAS C SAM


BOVAS C SAM (talk) 13:03, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Let Me Know the reason why my submission has been rejected so that I can make the corrections on my article. BOVAS C SAM (talk) 13:16, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That was not an article, it was a shameless and unsalvageable advertisement. Wikipedia is not here to promote your cause, however noble you perceive it to be. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:32, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:33:22, 13 February 2019 review of submission by Jamesmoviemake


I am confused why this submission was declined, please explain what I need to change. Jamesmoviemake (talk) 14:33, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused too. I've moved it to mainspace after it passed a copyvio check. Everyone involved has an article it seems so the film is somewhat notable. Legacypac (talk) 06:41, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:33:33, 13 February 2019 review of submission by Samimaraahmed


Samimaraahmed (talk) 15:33, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


17:19:02, 13 February 2019 review of submission by Potatowrite


Hi,

I've been attempting to update this for a while. I've not gotten any direct feedback outside of a request for a newspaper article and someone saying it was about pending events. I'm not sure what they were referencing with the pending events note, as the pedal company has been around for any amount of time.

I'm rather new at this editing and writing work, so any pointers would be great. The company referenced is one of the major players in the guitar pedal industry, but the sources tend to be rather geared to guitar magazines and sources rather than newspaper sources as the company's footprint appears to be minimal in their local base of operations (with pedals made off-site with another manufacturer, unlike many guitar pedal companies).

Best, Potatowrite Potatowrite (talk) 17:19, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Newspapers are just an example of WP:RS. Trade and music industry publications are what I would expect to see for sourcing. Legacypac (talk) 22:12, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19:16:40, 13 February 2019 review of submission by 63.83.229.146


This is not a resume, but an article about an important figure in software engineering that was pieced together by news articles. The citations make clear the import of this person's work.

63.83.229.146 (talk) 19:16, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No kidding - the guy created Siri before Apple bought it. I've accepted the page. Legacypac (talk) 06:37, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

20:31:09, 13 February 2019 review of submission by PatriciaHartley

We've been rejected three times, the latest for lack of notability. Can you give us some specific examples of what constitutes notability? We'll do everything we can to provide the requested info. Thanks! PatriciaHartley (talk) 20:31, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Who is "we", Wikipedia accounts are strictly for single person use only. Theroadislong (talk) 20:33, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have experience at AfD on a similar CU page with less sourcing and info that was kept. 110,000 owners is notable. I've accepted the page. Legacypac (talk) 22:10, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

21:24:43, 13 February 2019 review of draft by Sasannajmi


I would like to upload a picture for the draft page Politicrunch. I am the COPY RIGHT HOLDER as I created the website where the picture comes from. How do I go about uploading the Politicrunch logos? Thanks! Sasannajmi (talk) 21:24, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2019_February_13&oldid=884046066"