Wikipedia:Peer review/SnowRunner/archive1

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

SnowRunner

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I want to attempt to get the article to at least C class so I Could possibly consider a GA. It's a game I quite enjoy and could definitely benefit from some work being done on it.

Thanks, ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:28, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze Wolf: For starters, the Reception section could definitely stand to be more in-depth, and should ideally be made up of paragraphs individually summarizing responses to the gameplay, visuals, and audio, along with perhaps some other notable aspects. If a bunch of reviews say essentially the same thing about a particular aspect, a cluster of sources can be grouped together in an {{efn|}} template, and more specific observations by one or two reviewers should stand alongside that. Here are some examples to study so you can get an idea of what a Reception section should look like: one, two, three

As for the Gameplay section, I can safely assume there's no official instruction manual for this thing, so for sourcing the gameplay mechanics, you might have to use the game's reviews to verify the details. And for information on Development and Marketing/release, I'd suggest scrounging up any and all news, previews and press releases you can find. Hope this input was helpful. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 16:22, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze Wolf: to ensure that they saw the above. Z1720 (talk) 16:24, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did indeed see it. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:35, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze Wolf: I would highly recommend expanding the Development and Reception sections. Also, a little more info on the DLC and more sources in the Gameplay section would be appreciated. QuicoleJR (talk) 15:26, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see what I can do, though I'm not sure how much I can do for development and info on the DLC for gameplay with needing reliable sources. I might just do a complete rewrite of the Gameplay section since I (stupidly) decided to wrtie the section first and gather citations later... which was a bad idea. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:57, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]