User talk:ToppDogg10458

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Welcome!

Hello, ToppDogg10458! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:12, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Bizzle delete

The content was deleted because it offered excessive detail on a non-notable song. The material that is left is sufficient for a reader to understand the subject. References are not required since we don't need to delve into the lyrical content of the song. So to answer your question, while you may not be finished, it's not clear what sort of references you could add to the material to make it any better. However, if you want to expand it, use the Show preview button to see what it looks like and make corrections before saving it. Either I or another editor from the Christian music project will be reviewing the material for content and tone. You can make that easier by using reliable sources and by remaining neutral when describing the content and the events. I am not trying to censor you or the subject, but I am trying to follow the policies and guidelines that govern Wikipedia. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:20, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See I have left a message. Please read it and use {{talkback}} on my talk page after responding here. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:26, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I understand it was recently released. Feel free to summarize the lyrics, provided that it can be referenced to a reliable source. There is a large segment of Evangelicalism that agrees with Bizzle on the subject, however there are also many Evangelicals on the other side of the discussion and I am more concerned about walking the fine line between promoting a view homosexuality and LGBT matters and discussing the song.

I'm sure that it will see a bit of discussion on the coming weekend. What happens next week will determine how notable it really becomes.

You might want to focus on the websites that have been provided as reliable sources on the Christian music project page I linked to above to see what they have to say about this.

Oh, and good work on digging this up early. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:39, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have not reviewed your additions for content, but I did notice that the references are pretty badly messed-up. Please see Help:Referencing for beginners for tips on cleaning them up, and thanks for sticking with it. I hope I didn't come across too aggressively. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:35, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ToppDogg10458, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi ToppDogg10458! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Same Love (A response) (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Same Love (A response).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:04, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Same Love (A response) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Same Love (A response), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Same Love (A response)

Hello ToppDogg10458. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Same Love (A response)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Same Love (A response)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:01, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]