User talk:Monkeybait

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Sorry about licensing mistakes

I notice that you have been correcting my licensing omissions on on my uploads. Sorry about my mistakes. I don't think I knew about {{PD-USGov-Interior-BLM}} but I do now! Thanks, and Happy New Year! Regards, —mattisse (Talk) 19:07, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I just noticed it, so I changed it. Happy New Year!--Monkeybait (talk) 23:18, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Parenthetical disambiguation

Hello! Wikipedia's convention is to use parenthetical disambiguation strictly to differentiate between/among more than one article.
We do not use parenthetical disambiguation purely to convey additional information about the article's subject, and we do not redirect "Foo" to "Foo (disambiguation term)"; if a base title leads to an article by that name, it does so directly. Otherwise, it leads to a disambiguation page or to an article with a different title (not the same title with parenthetical disambiguation appended).
For instances in which other entities with the same name exist, no one is helped by redirecting "Foo" to "Foo (disambiguation term)," in which case the base title still leads to the article about one particular entity. Only when articles about the other entities are written is there any benefit to moving the first article away from the base title.
Thank you! —David Levy 05:48, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I realize you are an expert on military matters, so you do realize that there are multiple, for example, 27th Infantry Regiments in the world...right? Or are you just jumping in where you really have no clue? Love and kisses,xxxooo --Monkeybait

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 03:52, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removed PROD on Corps Support Group

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Corps Support Group, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks!

I removed this PROD because the rationale was subjective and unrelated to any WP Policy or Guideline. This is not the best of articles, nor is it properly referenced. That said, its been around since 2006 and I doubt that notability is an issue. Indeed this article needs improvement, but should get the scrutiny of an AfD before its deleted.--Mike Cline (talk) 23:54, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Himmler to Mufti telegram 1943.png

In this edit, you marked the image as pd-germany, which states "photographic works are copyrighted for 70 years after the death of the photographer (UrhG §§ 2, 64), and then enter the public domain.". The telegram was from 1943. Assuming the best possible case for this image being free under those terms, 1943+70 = 2013. This image is not pd by those terms. Could you please correct this? --Hammersoft (talk) 14:18, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All I did was replace a deprecated tag with the one I thought was the best fit. As the old PD tag is outdated, I have no idea what else to put on there. Unless there is a copyright tag to cover German govt images (which I didn't see), the image could always be put up for deletion.Monkeybait (talk) 00:12, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

duplicate image

This request was denied, because the two images were not exact duplicates. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 23:45, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blank user page

I know some users don't like to use userpages. However, they have a couple distinct advantages: 1. You can disclose who you are and what you like to do, 2. you can show users what type of experiences you have had on Wikipedia (FA, GA, DYK?, templates, Wikiprojects), which allows users to better orient questions, comments or invitations to your interests and ability (I get them all the time) and 3. So you don't look like a really new user on other user's watchlists: the red link to a user page sends up a red flag that the contributer is relatively new and thus all his/her edits need to be examined carefully. The last is why I am leaving a comment here. Please consider creating your user page, even if it does not disclose information about your real world self, it helps smooth interactions with other Wikipedians. Also, I would like to invite you to participate in the WP:Online Ambassadors program, however I cant judge if you are a good candidate, because of the lack of vanity wall, so to speak. I hope you consider the Ambassador, and not take my thoughts on User pages as an insult. Happy editing! Sadads (talk) 02:14, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I had one, but blanked it. Until I can think of what layout I would like, I will probably not do anything with it for now.Monkeybait (talk) 02:16, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bypassing redirects

Have you read WP:NOTBROKEN? There's really no reason to bypass all those redirects. Ntsimp (talk) 00:58, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Four star articles

Nice job on the admirals articles. Any chance you can maybe get some of the redlinks at List of active duty United States four-star officers? Thanks. – Connormah (talk) 17:39, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe eventually. I just figured starting an article is the biggest roadblock sometimes. If it gets started, usually people will then start adding to it very soon thereafter.--Monkeybait (talk) 03:57, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:69th Infantry.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:69th Infantry.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 02:41, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of arms images

I've brought up this subject on the Military History project page for discussion here. As you and I have been disagreeing about this for some time, I wanted to hear your thoughts on the matter. —Ed!^(talk) 20:32, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Social Security Administration images

A tag has been placed on Category:Social Security Administration images requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 04:26, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:PD-USGov-SSA

Template:PD-USGov-SSA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:12, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:PD-USGov-NEA

Template:PD-USGov-NEA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:14, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:National Endowment for the Arts images

A tag has been placed on Category:National Endowment for the Arts images requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 15:53, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]