User talk:Lyonspen
AfD nomination of Rafael Robb
Rafael Robb, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Rafael Robb satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rafael Robb and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Rafael Robb during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 02:23, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- I've improved the article Rafael Robb after listening to Wikipedia Weekly ep. 36, hopefully it can be rescued. -Kain Nihil 18:33, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Study
Hi Mike - not sure, but email me the material (my email is enabled - see left column on my Talk) and I'll look it over. Cheers Tvoz/talk 17:38, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
- On my talk page, look in the toolbox on the left - I think you should see "email this user" after "logs", as it's been enabled as long as I've been here. Tvoz/talk 18:08, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
- Got it - I'm tied up at the moment but I will look it over and be back to you in the next few days. Tvoz/talk 00:12, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Survey on high traffic articles
I have not edited much, but I have followed the South Ossetia war article closely since its creation, having followed developments in Transnistria, South Ossetia, and Abkhazia for some years now. I would be interested in what your survey uncovers and potentially participating. VЄСRUМВА ☎ 18:35, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Survey
Hi there. I filled out your survey on the Obama article. Let me know how things turn out (even if it takes a while).
Just FYI, the "leave me a message" at the top of your discussion page here links to leave a message on HailFire's talk page. I'm guessing you just copied and pasted his code but forgot to replace his username with yours. Just letting you know; I almost left him a message directed to you so I went ahead and fixed it for you ;) --Ubiq (talk) 19:51, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yikes. Thanks for doing the survey and the heads up about the add a section.lyonspen | (talk) 17:20, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Regarding the Survey
I'm sorry, I messed up on the e-mail part. You can find the explanation here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:HistoricWarrior007#E-mail_.22change.22 and my e-mail is Historicwarrior7@yahoo.com not HistoricWarrior007, that's my wiki ID. HistoricWarrior007 (talk) 22:08, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Survey: Concern
Hi Lyon,
I have a question, pretty much anybody can follow your contributions looking for your solicitation in this survey, click on the links provided on various talk pages and submit the review under different wiki accounts. Do you take this into account somehow? What's about the part of trying to keep the IP of the contributor private? (Igny (talk) 18:53, 18 July 2009 (UTC))
- Hi good point Igny. I have two ways of dealing with this: First, I ask for the user name. I will then reply to the talk page of those who reply.lyonspen | (talk) 19:57, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Collaborative news on quippd
Hey, I noticed that you listed yourself as invoked in the WikiProject Journalism project, and I hoped that you could help out on another collaborative community edited project.
I run quippd, a collaboratively edited social news site, which mixes elements of Wikis, social networking, and social news sites. You can get some more information about what we are doing at: http://quippd.com/about/intro
Basically, we want to get good coverage on news stories, collaboratively edited, like Wikipedia. We are trying to take the ideas of WikiFactCheck -- to make news less biased and speedier (unlike something like Wikinews). By combining social elements to the project, we hope to bring the benefits of wiki enabled fact checking and npov ideas to the masses.
I hope you check us out -- and feel free to contact me with any questions, comments, or concerns.
--Yoasif (talk) 02:31, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Invitation to join WikiProject United States
 |
Hello, Lyonspen! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!! |
--Kumioko (talk) 03:26, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
September 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
--Kumioko (talk) 02:18, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
--Kumioko (talk) 03:25, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joffe v. Google, Inc., you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Wired and James Ware (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Lyonspen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)