User talk:Jamie Kitson

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Jamie Kitson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This IP is my work address, we are not a web host provider. Jamie Kitson (talk) 5:19 am, Today (UTC−6)

Accept reason:

See below. —DoRD (talk) 19:06, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do see a long history of perfectly good edits from your account, but do not see a block applied to it. Possibly another editor at your place of work is to blame. Please post here the exact message you see when you try to edit.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:37, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

At the very least, you need to tell us what IP address is blocked, as otherwise we have no way of knowing, and so we can't unblock. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:49, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I thought IPs were logged. I am at 213.229.85.68, the error says: Editing from 213.229.64.0/18 has been blocked (disabled) by DeltaQuad for the following reason(s): The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because the IP range you are editing from is a web host provider... Jamie Kitson (talk) 15:07, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, IPs are logged, but for confidentiality reasons the logs are not available to most users, not even administrators. However, the administrator who placed the block is a checkuser, which means that he does have access to the IP logs. I will consult him on this. I hope the issue will be resolved soon, but please be patient. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:22, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you are willing to read and accept the conditions at WP:IPEC, we can start the process to give you IP-block exemption, which would make this a non-issue. Daniel Case (talk) 15:18, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but IP block exemption is not by any means automatic, and it is best not to grant it without first having a checkuser look at the case. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:22, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, he's not either of the abusive users that had used this range in the past several months, so IPBE is probably safe, though you might want to wait for DQ since he's more experienced. T. Canens (talk) 16:04, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, is it possible to show me the abusive edits? Jamie Kitson (talk) 16:36, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid that I cannot do that as that's prohibited by our privacy policy. I can tell you that one of them was using the range to evade a block, while the other was using the range, along with accounts on a number of other webhost ranges, to spam external links. T. Canens (talk) 16:43, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I just wondered on the off chance that it was one of my colleagues :) Jamie Kitson (talk) 17:06, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is unlikely that you know the person the block is intended to stop. I've gone ahead and given you IP block exemption so you should be able to edit again. —DoRD (talk) 19:06, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Now that the block has been changed to allow logged-in users to edit, IPBE is no longer necessary, so I've removed the exemption. Please let me know if you still have trouble editing. —DoRD (talk) 22:35, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thank you. Jamie Kitson (talk) 12:38, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Olympus Stylus Epic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Olympus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tense

I have thought about changing tense, but not done it often. As you note, Portra is still available because Kodak is still selling it. But Panatomic-X is still available because there are people selling old rolls. (I just bought two rolls dated 1962.) Many computer descriptions use past tense, even though at least one it still around. And the architecture exists even if no implementations still exist. Does seem that there should be more present tense. Gah4 (talk) 10:13, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It also meant that the second sentence didn't match the tense of the first.Jamie Kitson (talk) 12:06, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Jamie Kitson. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Tito Dutta (contact) 15:42, 25 March 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Jamie Kitson. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Tito Dutta (contact) 15:43, 25 March 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jamie Kitson. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jamie Kitson. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jamie Kitson. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]