User talk:Delboy666

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to A. A. Gill. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. Dekisugi (talk) 17:50, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 18:18, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AA Gill

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Do not re-insert the information that has been removed per biographies of living people, otherwise you risk being blocked from editing. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 22:43, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to A. A. Gill. Will ^(talk) 22:49, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 22:51, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to A. A. Gill, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:37, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]