User talk:AntiTheJakAremania

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

AntiTheJakAremania, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi AntiTheJakAremania! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:30, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Philippines national football team

I reverted your edit as 12-0 and 13-1 losses aren't the "worst" losses. The 15-0 loss is the worst defeat. –H T D 13:38, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Persib Bandung

The trimming was done because there are plenty information that are not referenced or the information does not match the references as discussed here. Regarding the affiliation status, please contribute here. In wikipedia reliable sources are needed. If you see unreferenced informations in other articles, you are free to remove it, that doesnt make it a justification to use unsourced informations in Persib Bandung article.

Seeing that you are a new editor, I would like to advice you to be careful with personal attacks against other users, see here. Since we are in English version of Wikipedia, please use English not Indonesian. Cheers!! MbahGondrong (talk) 08:32, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Persib Bandung does not have an edit summary.Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:47, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please remember that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on Persib Bandung. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:48, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Persib Bandung. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:39, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:41, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:AntiTheJakAremania reported by User:Walter Görlitz (Result: ). Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:04, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What this means is that you have made five reverts on an article in just over two days and I have opened a case with a group of administrators to investigate if any action should be taken against you. You should follow the links. You should explain your actions there. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:31, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Walter Görlitz that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:28, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Don't swear at me on my talk page. You alerted me to five articles that you felt had problems. I looked at them and agreed with you. I will be investigating them more closely when I have time. The fact that you wanted me to say "hey, there are articles on Wikipedia that have problems so you should leave the problems on the Persib Bandung article" doesn't make sense. What does make sense is that if any article on Wikipedia has problems, we should be fixing it. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:34, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with this edit to List of Persib Bandung Former Foreign Players. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. — MusikAnimal ^talk 17:46, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for including edit warring at Persib Bandung, harassment of other users, removal of AfD tags, and possible editing without being logged in. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 18:37, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've increased your block duration to one month from now for sock puppetry (see User:AntiTheJakAremania123). The next block will be indefinite.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:13, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have continued to edit in the same disruptive way as before, using at least one more sockpuppet account to do so after your block was extended because of earlier sockpuppetry. It is clear that you have no intention of editing in accordance with Wikipedia's standards, so the block on this account has been extended to indefinite. As long as your account is blocked, you do not have permission to edit Wikipedia at all. This applies to editing from any account, and also to anonymous editing without using an account. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:12, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]