Jump to content

Talk:Transport in Berlin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

vandal edits

Ip number 83.249.34.131 and user AviatorPontus are versions of the permanentkly blocked User JP eriksson and whos edits at least on sv:wp usually are undone on the spot. I wa not able to see which of his edits was still here so did not undo it myself here.Yger (talk) 07:56, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

None of his edits to this page were vandalism. +Angr 08:25, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Transport statistics

The article contains a table of statistics for various transport modes in Berlin. Unfortunately the quoted source for this is simply the address of web site containing lots of different statistics, and I cannot find the particular data used here. Which isn't to say it isn't there; statistical german certainly isn't my strong point. Can anybody help improve this cite?. -- Starbois (talk) 10:45, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cycling in Berlin

The article contains the following statement:

Riders have access to 620 kilometres (390 mi) of bike paths including some 150 kilometres (93 mi) of mandatory bicycle paths, 190 kilometres (120 mi) of off-road bicycle routes, 60 kilometres (37 mi) of bike lanes on the roads, 70 kilometres (43 mi) of shared bus lanes which are also open to bicyclists, 100 kilometres (62 mi) of combined pedestrian/bike paths and 50 kilometres (31 mi) of marked bike lanes on sidewalks.

This is justified by citations of:

Only the first of these contains any route length information, and it makes no mention of mandatory bicycle paths (whatever that is) or off-road bicycle routes. And it is ambiguous as to whether the bike lanes on the roads, shared bus lanes, combined pedestrian/bike paths and marked bike lanes on sidewalks are part of the 620km of bike paths or additional to them.

Can anybody help resolve this ambiguity, provide a source for the mandatory bicycle paths and off-road bicycle routes figures, or explain what a mandatory bicycle path is. TIA - Starbois (talk) 11:05, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sign indicating a mandatory bicycle path
A mandatory bicycle path is one that bicyclists are required to use. When a mandatory bicycle path is present, bicyclists are not allowed to ride in the street. They are distinguished from optional bicycle paths by the presence of a circular blue sign with a white outline of a bicycle on it (see image to the right). If a bike path doesn't have that sign, bicyclists may choose to ride in the street instead. +Angr 20:26, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Passengers per year OR boadings per year?

The article claims the U-Bahn has 457 million passengers per year. Is that correct? The entire population of Germany is less than 82 million. Do they really have that many tourists per year?173.60.95.232 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:47, 3 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Transport in Berlin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:51, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Glaring Omission

Trains are hardly mentioned at all.-62.156.151.11 (talk) 13:36, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]