Talk:Transcription of Australian Aboriginal languages
A fact from Transcription of Australian Aboriginal languages appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 May 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Transcription of Australian Aboriginal languages:
|
Requested move
There's a new poll here that would (hopefully) end all this "Indigenous" vs. "Aborigine" controversy. Feel free to vote. Zarbat 09:21, 13 November 2006 (UTC) gogo —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.45.211.101 (talk) 08:40, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
New section?
Under the heading 'Early writing' I would like to summarise the known research that interprets the idiosyncratic transcription systems used by individual scribes, eg. Daisy Bates, Spencer & Gillen, etc. If this gets too long-winded it could moved to a separate main article entitled something like 'Early transcription conventions of Australian Aboriginal writers'. Such an article would make a genuinely useful reference for people working with the archives. Thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AustKin (talk • contribs) 00:13, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- Start-Class Writing system articles
- Mid-importance Writing system articles
- Start-Class Australia articles
- Mid-importance Australia articles
- Start-Class Indigenous peoples of Australia articles
- Top-importance Indigenous peoples of Australia articles
- WikiProject Indigenous peoples of Australia articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists