Talk:Special Report (TV program)

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Special Report (TV program) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Television

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Questionshould be? Can Trump beat Bernie Sanders?

POV?

Re: my recent revert: the section added seems very POV to me, arguing that Special Report is biased rather than presenting both sides. The section of the article in its current stance marked "Bias" covers much of the same material. If the deleted material is to be returned to the article, I suggest it should go here, and that the wording needs to be changed substantially so as to present a critical view rather than endorse it. Heimstern Läufer 21:44, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mort Kondracke

I don't think categorizing him as "right-of-centre" is fair, and smells of bias. He was on Nixon's enemies list and is a Democrat.

Sadistik 09:01, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mort fancies himself as center-left, but clearly a moderate. I could not characterize him as left or right. It just depends. --Akc2543 (talk) 04:42, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bias section

The FDR-related accusations are sloppy and don't contain context, and only amount to namecalling. The section does not show what is being referred to, only throwing in a few links to Media Matters and namedropping left-leaning pundits. This should be brought to WP standards. Sadistik 08:41, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. The current biased section is so messy it'd be best off being completely removed. I can't even follow it. If no one objects, I'll remove it in the coming days. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cs92 (talk • contribs) 13:28, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed as per this discussion. Arzel (talk) 17:17, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hume Retirement

While this is not proposed heading, we have to be flexible with this as a replacement has not been announced. he stated on the O'Reilly Factor that his last day was Dec. 23. I added the content about his retirement, but could not add that without citation. I can add that once the video has been posted. --Akc2543 (talk) 04:45, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article really needs to be updated.

Especially the panelist list, looks like it's 15 years old. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZeroXero (talk • contribs) 18:20, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]