Jump to content

Talk:Patton (disambiguation)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Recent additions

I don't have time at the moment, but the newest edit should be reviewed with WP:MOSDAB in mind. Items I would (and will unless someone has time sooner):

  1. Sort by most likely target (George S. undoubtedly comes out on top).
  2. Review some of the names - will people enter just 'Patton' to find them?
  3. Remove extraneous blue links. dab pages are primarily for finding the target page.

John (Jwy) 19:51, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've made an attempt at item 1, and completed item 3. John (Jwy) 14:55, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 September 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Favonian (talk) 16:34, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Patton (disambiguation)Patton – As with Cosby I don't see a clear primary topic. By views Patton Oswalt has the most (101,579) then the current target, George (72,863), the film has 17,604 which though based on the general is a full match for "Patton", the tank has 1,552 though may not be a full match, the place in Pennsylvania has 333, the place in Missouri has 157, the place in California has 104, the surname has 77, the hundred has 18, the place in Shropshire has 16, the place in West Virginia has 14, the place in Illinois has 12 and the place in Indianan has 8[[1]]. Its not clear if the film is a competitor or not but due to being named after the general but even still I don't see a clear primary topic. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:43, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.