Talk:NGC 7742

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Requested move

Seyfert Galaxy NGC 7742 → NGC 7742 : propor name, goes with new rule of not naming galaxies with there type in the page : — Hurricane Dev o n @ 20:31, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey and discussion

Support: It's the proper name. Theres a new rule going around that astronomical object artical titles are not to have what the object is then it's name. [1] — Hurricane Dev o n @ 20:31, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes! - I have always opposed these strange and incorrectly-capitalised article titles which include the type of object. Great to see there's a move to make sure they're at decent titles. Worldtraveller 20:41, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I have always opposed these weird names, like Worldtraveller does. 132.205.44.134 21:38, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. —Nightst a llion (?) ^{Seen this already?} 06:53, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this is a bit late, but the other similarly named articles can be renamed too. I'm fairly sure we've got consensus without the need of more votings. (HD: NGC 7742 is a designation, not a proper name. This galaxy doesn't have one.)--Jyril 19:12, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on 20 Aug 2006 edits

A few comments on my 20 Aug 2006 edits:

I removed all references to fried eggs. This looks like it was originally a comment on the appearance of an image of this galaxy that was extended into a hypothetical name. It simply was not appropriate here.
NED lists NGC 7742 as a LINER/HII, not a Seyfert, so I removed all references to this being a Seyfert galaxy.
The distance was unreferenced, so I deleted it.
I cannot get the image to display properly. One image was deleted. A second image can be found through the "What links here" link on the left. However, I had problems adding the image into the fact box. Help would be appreciated.

GeorgeJBendo 12:22, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

I have added the image and I hope it looks ok. Please refer to the code used for future reference.--Kalsermar 17:51, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think my problem was that I was trying to add the image name while filling in the spaces with "_" characters. Thank you for adding the image. GeorgeJBendo 18:42, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NGC 7742. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070117183551/http://www.spacetelescope.org/images/html/opo9828a.html to http://www.spacetelescope.org/images/html/opo9828a.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:30, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]