The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Leadnow article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
@Darryl Kerrigan: Pretty sure for organizations that have alternate names in another language, we just have the official English name as the article title for en.wikipedia.org and we'd list the other name (as you already have) in the page. Have you seen guidance otherwise? —Joeyconnick (talk) 18:19, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No, I am not aware of any Wikipedia policy on that question. I hadn't realized that the organization had a French name when the article was created. Perhaps because of official bilingualism which has been drilled into me over the years, I assumed both should be included. Of course, Wikipedia articles are meant to be written for an international audience, and this is an English language portal of Wikipedia. I am mostly indifferent to whether the A L'action name is used or not. I would expect it would make sense if the organization is known prominently by both, which I am not sure is the case here. Furthermore, I am not actually sure how active the organization is Quebec or other parts of French Canada as A L'action. If the consensus is to use the English name only, I am not opposed. I note also that I added a Canadian English tag to the talk page, for what that is worth. Anyway, I digress...--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 18:45, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Also, as far as I am aware there is no French language website for the organization, and the name A L'action seems to also be used, and more prominently used, by a news publication.--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 18:52, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Correcting vandalism
This article was vandalized at 2 AM on June 5th 2020 to insert overt politicization of the subject matter. The article has since been edited by the co-ED of the organization to reverse the vandalism. Transparency disclosure: I work at Leadnow which is what first brought this vandalism to my attention. DynamicUno (talk) 21:42, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
