The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
This article was nominated for deletion on 13 October 2023. The result of the discussion was no consensus.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blogging, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BloggingWikipedia:WikiProject BloggingTemplate:WikiProject BloggingBlogging articles
This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
This page should not be speedily deleted because the reasons for its previous deletion--about which the editors then seemed on the fence-- have been addressed through revisions. The main issue, previously, concerned not the importance of Daily Nous, but rather whether the right kinds of references to it existed and so could be cited. Since its earlier deletion, at least two significant citations have been added. One is a reference from the New York Times identifying Daily Nous as "popular philosophy news site." This added to the already existing and cited references to Daily Nous in similar terms by other media outlets. The other was a reference to a Quillette article about a Daily Nous discussion. I see that this reference was removed by an editor in June because Quillette is not considered reliable; however, Quillette was not being cited to establish any particular fact; rather, it was cited as an example of an article about Daily Nous. I would argue for reinserting the citation. I know Wikipedia has its ways, yet it is strange to me that the primary news and discussion site for an entire academic discipline, which has been referenced repeatedly in mainstream media and academic work, should not have a Wikipedia page. Justin Weinberg (talk) 19:55, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=icon}
