Talk:CoRoT-1
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Rating Change
Based on expansions that I have made, I'm changing this articles' class rating to C for now. Jayhawke (talk) 21:10, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was move. JPG-GR (talk) 20:12, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Requesting the following group of moves:
- COROT-Exo-1 → COROT-1
- COROT-Exo-1b → COROT-1b
- COROT-Exo-2b → COROT-2b
- COROT-Exo-3b → COROT-3b
- COROT-Exo-4 → COROT-4
- COROT-Exo-4b → COROT-4b
- COROT-Exo-5b → COROT-5b
- COROT-Exo-6b → COROT-6b
- COROT-Exo-7b → COROT-7b
The names of the COROT planets have been changed to drop the "Exo-" part. Reference: [1]. This change has already been applied to the Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia [2]. Icalanise (talk) 17:40, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Strongly agree Having Exo- in these designations seems unnecessary and taking up a lot of space. It seems that no host star and planet designations besides COROT designations have Exo- in it. For example, when the first planet discovered by Kepler, the first Kepler designation will not be Kepler-Exo-1b but Kepler-1b. BlueEarth (talk | contribs) 19:25, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Well, how can you know what designation theme they will use? Anyway, I agree of course because we should follow the designation theme as suggested by the original discoverers. — JyriL talk 13:10, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on COROT-1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100407195740/http://exoplanet.eu/papers/PR-CoRoT-1.pdf to http://exoplanet.eu/papers/PR-CoRoT-1.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:02, 29 January 2018 (UTC)