Jump to content

Talk:2003 Casablanca bombings

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Restaurant

The restaurent proprietary isn't Italian Jewish, it is Spanish Please correct

Fazazi

How about adding Mohammed Fazazi to this article. He was preaching in Hamburg at the time some of the 9/11-terrorists (Hamburg cell) attended the al-Quds Mosque. And he is imprisoned in Morocco(?) now, due to his relation to the Casablanca bombings. At least, as far as I understood it. ... Though I read, that he is allowed to stay in contact via mobilephone and snailmail with the rest of the world. JanCK 10:22, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Motivation for the attack

From the article "The motive behind the bombings was probably the fact that Morocco had a history of good relationship with Jews". Huh? If Morocco has a history of good relations with Jews, why were they targetted? The above sentence doesn't make any sense as it is; can anyone expand on it? SoulSkorpion (talk) 03:05, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 05:41, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 05:41, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Arrested 2000 people

that doesn't seem right, they couldn't have arrested 2000 people in connection with the bombings — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.102.184.122 (talk) 16:54, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2003 Casablanca bombings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:21, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2003 Casablanca bombings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:06, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2003 Casablanca bombings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:40, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2003 Casablanca bombings/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: NAADAAN (talk · contribs) 22:04, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Rollinginhisgrave (talk · contribs) 02:19, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this on. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 02:19, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

General comments

I'll be adding things as I go. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 02:37, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Closing this up to due to nominator inactivity. Hopefully these issues can be addressed and it can be renominated, thankyou! Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 02:19, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prose/content

Lede

  • and sites near the Belgian consulate and an old Jewish cemetery The sites were near both the Belgian consulate and an old Jewish cemetery, or there were sites near the consulate and also sites near the cemetery?
  • revendicated Simpler word
  • claiming the lives of WP:EUPHEMISM
  • 33 victims and 12 suicide bombers in the infobox it says 11 attackers were killed.
  • on the spot More clear
  • The attacks came in a rise in radical preachers ungrammatical
  • many of the preachers were veterans of the Soviet-Afghan war non-sequitur
  • led to the terrorist cell's ringleader led to the... capture?
  • after following a radical preacher Bentassir was following the preacher or they were?
  • unclear circumstances -> contested circumstances
  • The attacks shined light idiom
  • with a government initiative fighting against slums reword for clarity
  • after a series of attacks in 2007. clarify who the attacks are on.

Just having gone through the lede, I can see many grammatical issues, and a lack of clarity and colloquial language. Please complete a copyedit of the article before I continue my review of the article, to ensure I am not repeating myself.

Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 02:37, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.