User talk:Luitzen

This is Luitzen's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blazegraph (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nosebagbear were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

REVIEWER: The article reads more like a purely positive listing of big/good things blazegraph has & has done. It doesn't read as a balanced text, including things like considering critical reception (positive and negative).

Additionally, your sources are generally either primary (linkedin etc), not reliable (wikimedia, github etc) or not independent, which includes press-releases etc and anything with an association that might prevent neutrality. This therefore includes everything from the wiki to sourceforge.

Even sources that pass these need to give in depth coverage of Blazegraph.

Try hunting for mentions in things like journal articles etc (Books/newspapers also great, but harder to find on this, i assume)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blazegraph and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Blazegraph, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nosebagbear (talk) 10:01, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luitzen! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nosebagbear (talk) 10:01, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NitrosBase has been accepted

NitrosBase, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 16:05, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve NitrosBase

Thanks for creating NitrosBase.

A New Page Patroller Xevus11 just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

The article reads a bit like a formal description of the software, perhaps you could change the language a bit to make it more readable for those unfamiliar with database systems?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Xevus11 (talk) 04:58, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]