This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kamelkev(talk | contribs) at 02:43, 17 August 2017(Warning: Three-revert rule. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:43, 17 August 2017 by Kamelkev(talk | contribs)(Warning: Three-revert rule. (TW))
This user is busy in real life until somewhere in January 2012 and may not respond swiftly to queries.((s)low wiki access due to slow internet, limited internet access, and little time)
You have anything to tell me, or want to ask me a question? Add it here: user talk:Beetstra
August 2017
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You should take your own advice. History shows you reverting 3 entries before I did. I thought we're trying to make a good article about TSDB - instead we're arguing over one of the most popular TSDB in the world being qualified for this article. Ridiculous.
Beetstra, D. J.; Walker, M. A.; Wheatley, N. “Getting the Chemistry Right: Working with the Wider Community to make Wikipedia a Reliable Source”, poster to be presented at the 5th Annual “Wikimania” conference, August 26–28, 2009, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
You did the migration of COIBot, and as you must be beer free, please have this very expensive award and the beer will have to be taken on notice. — billinghurstsDrewth 03:40, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
#. What are the Local spam blacklist and the Meta spam blacklist, what are they for, and which are the (core) policies and guidelines that they relate to. How should this functionality be used (also in conjunction with the Local Spam-whitelist and/or XLinkBot)? What would you look at if you were (to handle a request) to blacklist an abused site (I'm using the term 'abused site' with he aim to span more than plain spam)? And what would you look at when you were (to handle a request) to whitelist a specific link on a blacklisted domain or (to handle a request) to de-blacklist the whole domain?