Jump to content

User talk:Capankajsmilyo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Laurdecl (talk | contribs) at 07:38, 19 June 2017 (Wikidata infoboxes: R Cyphoidbomb). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Barnstars

The Jain Barnstar
For your contribution to the 'Jainism' related articles. --(nimit)
Thank you :D-- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo 14:37, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The Special Barnstar
Hi Pankaj, thanks for your contribution to government related projects. You are valuable for Wikipedia. Keep it up. Thanks again.-- Human3015TALK  10:23, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thankyou Human3015 :) -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 11:53, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The Original Barnstar
Thank you Pankaj for your fantastic contributions to Wikipedia:WikiProject Jainism. I have been following your edits and it is heartening to note that you have brought new enthusiasm to 'Jainism' related articles. Your articles on Jain monks and Jain temples are very important. Keep up the great work, looking forward to working with you. Aayush18 (talk) 04:35, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot Aayush18 :) -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 02:38, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The Original Barnstar
I've seen you a couple of times, and just wanted to thank you for your continuous, helpful contributions. Cheers! Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:39, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot. Coming from you, this means a lot. :D -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 20:40, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The Resilient Barnstar
For your ceaseless efforts at Mahavira, Digambara and Jain monasticism despite the major issues we had to face. I am sure you will learn from these reviews and it will help you write a lot of wonderful articles in the future! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 09:09, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The Jain Barnstar
For your contribution to the Jainism related articles. --Nizil (talk) 07:10, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou Nizil Shah -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 19:14, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to rename categories

Please see my proposal to speedily rename

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
1,336 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Pradhan Mantri Gramin Awaas Yojana (talk) Add sources
17 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Global Investors Summit (talk) Add sources
16 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Pooled Finance Development Fund Scheme (talk) Add sources
32 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Police (talk) Add sources
81 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Vibrant Gujarat (talk) Add sources
35 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Rural Landless Employment Guarantee Programme (talk) Add sources
249 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Revised National Tuberculosis Control Program (talk) Cleanup
10 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Nityanand Swami (Paramhansa) (talk) Cleanup
44 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Paramahamsa (talk) Cleanup
794 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Nizam of Hyderabad (talk) Expand
11,502 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Megyn Kelly (talk) Expand
133 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Pradhan Mantri Adarsh Gram Yojana (talk) Expand
56 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Public image of Narendra Modi (talk) Unencyclopaedic
2,572 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Star Trek: The Original Series (talk) Unencyclopaedic
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Civil society campaign (talk) Unencyclopaedic
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Mula Sangha (talk) Merge
829 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Atal Pension Yojana (talk) Merge
1,459 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Digital India (talk) Merge
171 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Providing Urban Amenities to Rural Areas (talk) Wikify
137 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C NBCC (India) Limited (talk) Wikify
272 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Hayagriva (talk) Wikify
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Pulse (confectionery) (talk) Orphan
229 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Welfare schemes for women in India (talk) Orphan
32 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Amir Amanullah Khan Award (talk) Orphan
193 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Ministry of Rural Development (India) (talk) Stub
38 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start 15 point Programme for minorities (talk) Stub
53 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Mahisagar district (talk) Stub
19 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Kunthunatha (talk) Stub
14 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Vladimir Suteev (talk) Stub
1,288 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Start Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:03, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leetul Gogoi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leetul Gogoi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leetul Gogoi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 09:32, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

19:05, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata infoboxes

Hi Capankajsmilyo. The WD infoboxes you've recently made are mostly wrappers for the standard template. The end goal is to have Wikidata in the main template, not as a side template. Just a heads up – it's easier to copy the template, change it, then move that code back to the main one, instead of making a wrapper. Thanks, Laurdecl talk 06:34, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

According to the discussions going on at present, it seems unlikely that the objective will be achieved anytime soon. Till that time it's better to have wrappers, since the changes in main template gets incorporated automatically. Thanks for informing though. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 08:44, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
What I mean is that we have Wikidata in the main infobox as opt-in, so articles won't be changed unless fetchwikidata=ALL is specified. The goal is to have all infoboxes with the ability to fetch from Wikidata and automatically, without the editor using a special template. Laurdecl talk 07:28, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

15:30, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Your question about bots on the Teahouse

I am way behind on the archives, but you never got a response to your question over a month ago about bots. I think that type of question can be answered at WP:VPT.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:39, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata infobox makes article worse

Please don't replace standard infoboxes with Wikidata infoboxes if they are less complete or sourced than the original version, as you are thereby making the article actievly worse. You have been reverted twice at Prachi Desai, and you have done the same at e.g. Sidharth Malhotra or Evelyn Sharma. Using Wikidat to make enwiki better may be defensible (though never necessary), but using it to make enwiki worse is not really acceptable. Fram (talk) 06:45, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mewar I

Template:Mewar I has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:14, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata infoboxes

Hi there, re: this edit, would you please be so kind as to edify me on where consensus was established to replace infoboxes with Wikidata infoboxes? I'd like to read up on the rationale, since I can imagine problems arising with referencing, since it's often useful to have references in infoboxes. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:23, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb: There isn't. There was an RfC that found consensus to modify infoboxes to use Wikidata (Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wikidata Phase 2), but not to actually replace infoboxes in articles. We are working on importing references from Wikidata at Template:Infobox person/Wikidata. Eventually this template will be merged with Template:Infobox person (Wikidata usage will remain optional, of course). Thanks, Laurdecl talk 07:37, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]