Jump to content

Talk:2014 shootings at Parliament Hill, Ottawa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by InternetArchiveBot (talk | contribs) at 17:39, 26 September 2016 (Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.2.4)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Apparent contradiction

In the wake of the incident, the Canadian government introduced a bill to expand the powers and courtroom anonymity of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), Canada's spy agency. The bill was slated to be introduced the day of the shootings, which postponed it.

OK if the word "introduced" means into parliament, this may be technically consistent. But the text should be written in a clearer way, if, indeed, this has any place in the article.

All the best: Rich Farmbrough18:33, 11 November 2014 (UTC).

Example:

The Canadian government had already prepared a bill to expand the powers and courtroom anonymity of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), Canada's spy agency, which was due to be introduced the day of the shootings, and was postponed by the event.

All the best: Rich Farmbrough18:35, 11 November 2014 (UTC).

Funeral Reactions

Not sure the right way to phrase this, but the Canadian funeral services industry also responded to Cpl. Cirillo's death. He was buried in a Victoriaville "Dominion Maple" casket (donated by Victoriaville Caskets), which is the same casket chosen by the Canadian government for the unknown Soldier in Ottawa. [1] [2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.187.121.73 (talk) 05:00, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mother's opinion

I do not care what his mother thought and I think the sentence "In his mother's opinion, the attack was the "last desperate act" of someone with a mental disorder who felt trapped.[14]" is hearsay and does not add anything to this page. I vote for its removal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.116.255.123 (talk) 02:42, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We don't decide these things on subjective opinions. We have policies at Wikipedia for inclusion or not. We also don't vote, we work towards consensus. Alaney2k (talk) 16:43, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unencycplopaedic slang

The statement that "the downtown core of Ottawa was placed on lockdown" is unencyclopaedic slang, and poor English. "Central Ottawa was subject to unprecedented security measures" would be a more accurate statement.Royalcourtier (talk) 07:24, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

what is wrong with lockdown? A similar thing happened after the Boston Marathon bombing and the same term was used. All buildings closed etc. Legacypac (talk) 07:49, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"Lockdown" is, in fact, the term used by the CBC, National Post, Global Television, The Globe and Mail, Ottawa Citizen, CTV, BBC, Yahoo!/Agence France-Presse, etc. In fact, the usage of "lockdown" to describe what happened is pretty much universal. Resolute 14:41, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"Central Ottawa was subject to unprecedented security measures" is so vague as to be meaningless. Were there more police officers on patrol? Tanks in the street? Mounties going door-to-door? "Lockdown" is a common and easily understood word. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 03:51, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stopping member

What does "A member praised Zehaf-Bibeau as a martyr after prayers, leading to the police stopping him for national security reasons the next day" mean? How do police "stop" someone for national security reasons? Arrest, detain, stop in the street?Royalcourtier (talk) 07:35, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2014 shootings at Parliament Hill, Ottawa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:39, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]