No copyright concern. False positive. Another IMDb false positive from the same user. No text shows in the DD but I believe the cast list may be triggering something. Articles are stubs too. NortyNort(Holla)08:50, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The link is a copy of our article of about March 2010. Our article was called "Inhalant" prior to April 2010, and its contents have been built up piecemeal by numerous contributors, not created in a single lump which may have come from an external source.
A external link search for www.tititudorancea.com shows that a number of articles copied from Wikipedia are now being used as references within those Wikipedia articles. This needs to be cleaned up.-gadfium01:49, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There is an acknowledgement at the bottom of the article right before the listing of the Categories that... "This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)"
Regardless of that statement, for Wikipedia's purposes the article is virtually unsourced and contains only one inline citation. Shearonink (talk) 05:38, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
User:Fernandosmission has engaged in chronic copy and paste copyright violations. I have spent some time investigation this user's work, and while I believe the user has made many useful contributions, I continue to find issues with newly created articles from this user. User was previously warned on their Talk Page about copying and pasting, and agreed to stop, however has continued since that time to add prose that is only slightly altered from the source text. I have placed a one week block on the User, and have investigated most of the issues previously listed on the User's Talk page and they seem to have been resolved, however I request assistance with checking more recent work from the user, specifically dating from March 11 to the present time. I do not have time today to continue with this so I request more help from other editors. Best regards, EvilphoenixTalk19:19, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I just happened to notice this one early. It's unusual that these are actually even looked at until a week after listing, when they come current for closure. :) Do we need a WP:CCI on this contributor? --Moonriddengirl(talk)20:49, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well I don't have time to do much with this at the moment, I wasnt aware of the CCI process. I can extend the block if you think that this might not get much attention until its further along in the process and more people are looking at it. Referring to CCI may be neccessary, I am hoping the user will correct their behavior but there is no certainty. EvilphoenixTalk09:18, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
