Talk:Legal guardian

This talk page is for discussion on how to improve the Legal guardian article.
If you would like to ask questions about the subject, please address them to the Reference desk.

Conservatorship Merger Proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The result was keep separate. -- Debate 木 00:08, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It would be a big mistake to merge "conservatorship" with "legal guardian. The use of conservatorship to manage the fiancial services industry in its crisis means that a separate article is justified. The article would be improved by discussion of this issue in detail. Angie Y. 00:39, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

German law

The section seems to be rather tendentious. Apparently the Werner Fuss Zentrum appears to be a group opposed to involuntary commitment. Fair enough, but I believe the section should be rewritten nonetheless, to comply with NPOV policy and be somewhat more informative. The Werner Fuss Zentrum would serve it's cause better by choosing a less alarmist tone and reporting some specific facts. 86.56.109.195 (talk) 06:52, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

German Law

I think this section should be deleted entirely, as it doesn't speak to the overall tone or information of the article. I feel as though the article can be complete without it.207.180.32.26 (talk) 19:43, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]