This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Lovelano(talk | contribs) at 16:59, 21 June 2024(Removed photo request due to addition of photo in edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Noe_Valley_public_toilet&diff=1230131522&oldid=1222139566). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 16:59, 21 June 2024 by Lovelano(talk | contribs)(Removed photo request due to addition of photo in edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Noe_Valley_public_toilet&diff=1230131522&oldid=1222139566)
Grabar, Henry (October 28, 2022). "A Crappy Process in San Francisco". Slate Magazine. San Francisco's $1.7 million toilet: How Civic Design Reviews make even simple public design take forever. […] The No. 1 and No. 2 Reasons That San Francisco's $1.7 Million Toilet Is a Scandal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sanitation, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sanitation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SanitationWikipedia:WikiProject SanitationTemplate:WikiProject Sanitationsanitation articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. No consensus at this time; editors supporting consider the title more recognizable, editors opposing consider it less precise and less descriptive. The article may also be taken to AfD at any time, in line with comments by [[User:CityUrbanism|]] and [[User:Festucalex|]]. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 23:21, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Noe Valley public toilet → ? – "Noe Valley public toilet" has almost no use in sources. Don't know what it should be moved to as most sources seem to refer to it with some variation of "1.7 million dollar toilet" but I'm not sure how suitable that is. BhamBoi (talk) 20:45, 5 March 2023 (UTC) BhamBoi (talk) 20:45, 5 March 2023 (UTC) — Relisting.echidnaLives - talk - edits06:51, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, unless someone thinks of something better, or reliable sources have a better description than a generic "$1.7 million toilet", this seems like a good WP:PRECISE, WP:NDESC compromise. Zzyzx11 (talk) 02:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also, think about what name someone would want to look for more information about this on after seeing it on the news. It'd be the name commonly associated with it. Probably not this BhamBoi (talk) 17:25, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support "1.7 million dollar public toilet" or something similar on recognizability grounds. The toilet is mainly notable for its specific price tag of $1.7 million, and a more recognizable title should get that across. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 04:03, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support "1.7 million dollar public restroom" per recognizability, descriptive titles, and ENGVAR (we don't call these "public toilets" in American English). RedSlash21:28, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Really? The sources at the top of this page use a mix of "public bathroom" and "public toilet". Some using the term "toilet" are U.S. based, including the first three, CBS News, NBC and San Francisco Chronicle. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I don't know if this subject merits its own article, but I did some updates. The original $1.7 million project will not be happening, and a cheaper option has been approved. EponineBunnyKickQueen (talk) 18:04, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]