Jump to content

Talk:Washington State Route 168

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 23:20, 10 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "GA" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject United States}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Good articleWashington State Route 168 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 25, 2010Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Washington State Route 168/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer:CGTalk 20:22, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    "Forrest Roads" in RD.
    Fixed. --Admrboltz (talk) 00:23, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    No reference for the final sentence of RD.
    Doesn't really need one, look at any map to see any detour. --Admrboltz (talk) 00:23, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    An image of the area would be nice, but not necessary for GAs.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Just fix the two comments and its all good. Merry Christmas! –CGTalk 20:22, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Looks all good. Pass. Merry Christmas! –CGTalk 06:52, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]