Talk:Oyster Point (Australia)

Australia: Places / Queensland Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Oyster Point (Australia) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian places (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Oyster Point (Australia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070903091907/http://wilderness.org.au/campaigns/marine/hinchinbrook_island/19991102_mr/ to http://www.wilderness.org.au/campaigns/marine/hinchinbrook_island/19991102_mr/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:07, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation of the issues with the article

I added a "multiple issues box" for the following reasons:

POV: The article now makes a number of extraordinary claims (such as the claim that a group of men assaulted activists while police looked on), without any citation. Also, the additions to the article consistently takes the point of view of the environmentalists.
Citations: many of the citations are unverifiable, because they do not identify any particular work. Without those, the article is largely uncited.

Vahurzpu (talk) 16:17, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]